Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Supreme Court v. Democracy
The Nations justice correspondent previews the courts coming termand explains why it will never stand up to Trump.
After the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022 with its landmark decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Womens Health Organization, I hoped that Democrats would finally get a clue: The Supreme Court is not our friend. It has been corrupted and weaponized and functions as an antidemocratic enforcement mechanism of the Republican political agenda. When its not prosecuting the culture war on behalf of white-wing bigots, its destroying organized labor, engaging in copaganda, and anointing kings. The revocation of abortion rights was an opportunity for elected Democrats to wean themselves off the anachronistic view that the court is an apolitical engine of justice that must be deferred to and respected.
The opportunity was squandered. The Biden administration not only followed the letter and spirit of the Supreme Courts various rulings, hobbling its own agenda; the president failed to use his bully pulpit to its fullest to turn public opinion against the court. The high court stymied one of Bidens most popular initiatives, student-loan debt relief, and the administration did nothing. ProPublica handed the Democrats the largest Supreme Court corruption scandal in US historythe revelation that billionaire Harlan Crow had provided lavish, undisclosed vacations and other gifts to Justice Clarence Thomasand the Democrats did next to nothing beyond writing a few angry letters and voting to issue some congressional subpoenas that were promptly ignored. Democrats refused to organize around court expansion or any other reform that could have reduced the power of this antidemocratic institution. They continued to prop up the court at the very moment there was an opportunity to cut it down to size.
Anytime I complained about this in print, on television, or at any bar in DC that would still offer me service, I was informed by establishment Democrats, left-of-center lawyers, and even some progressives that protecting the independence and strength of the Supreme Court was necessary. They argued that the public would not accept a Democratic Party that openly defied the courts. They said that a strong Supreme Court was a necessary check against a potential Trump administration.
I told those people they were foolsand events have since proved me right. The Supreme Court has shown time and again that it will provide no resistance to Donald Trump. Quite the opposite, as the court has become an enforcement arm of Trumps illegal, unconstitutional agenda. Meanwhile, Trump flouts and defies court orders he doesnt like without paying any appreciable price in the court of public opinion. The Supreme Court has revealed itself to be a useful tool for legitimizing Trumps policies, and an ineffectual restraint against anything Trump wants to do.
https://www.thenation.com/article/society/supreme-court-term-worst-cases/
After the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022 with its landmark decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Womens Health Organization, I hoped that Democrats would finally get a clue: The Supreme Court is not our friend. It has been corrupted and weaponized and functions as an antidemocratic enforcement mechanism of the Republican political agenda. When its not prosecuting the culture war on behalf of white-wing bigots, its destroying organized labor, engaging in copaganda, and anointing kings. The revocation of abortion rights was an opportunity for elected Democrats to wean themselves off the anachronistic view that the court is an apolitical engine of justice that must be deferred to and respected.
The opportunity was squandered. The Biden administration not only followed the letter and spirit of the Supreme Courts various rulings, hobbling its own agenda; the president failed to use his bully pulpit to its fullest to turn public opinion against the court. The high court stymied one of Bidens most popular initiatives, student-loan debt relief, and the administration did nothing. ProPublica handed the Democrats the largest Supreme Court corruption scandal in US historythe revelation that billionaire Harlan Crow had provided lavish, undisclosed vacations and other gifts to Justice Clarence Thomasand the Democrats did next to nothing beyond writing a few angry letters and voting to issue some congressional subpoenas that were promptly ignored. Democrats refused to organize around court expansion or any other reform that could have reduced the power of this antidemocratic institution. They continued to prop up the court at the very moment there was an opportunity to cut it down to size.
Anytime I complained about this in print, on television, or at any bar in DC that would still offer me service, I was informed by establishment Democrats, left-of-center lawyers, and even some progressives that protecting the independence and strength of the Supreme Court was necessary. They argued that the public would not accept a Democratic Party that openly defied the courts. They said that a strong Supreme Court was a necessary check against a potential Trump administration.
I told those people they were foolsand events have since proved me right. The Supreme Court has shown time and again that it will provide no resistance to Donald Trump. Quite the opposite, as the court has become an enforcement arm of Trumps illegal, unconstitutional agenda. Meanwhile, Trump flouts and defies court orders he doesnt like without paying any appreciable price in the court of public opinion. The Supreme Court has revealed itself to be a useful tool for legitimizing Trumps policies, and an ineffectual restraint against anything Trump wants to do.
https://www.thenation.com/article/society/supreme-court-term-worst-cases/
A must-read.
— Karoli (@karoli.bsky.social) 2025-10-06T17:18:03.325Z
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

The Supreme Court v. Democracy (Original Post)
demmiblue
9 hrs ago
OP
dweller
(27,261 posts)1. " wait for him to move on or die "
Bayard
(27,278 posts)2. I've never noticed before.....
The women are on the outside of both rows.
creeksneakers2
(7,830 posts)3. Expanding the court probably wouldn't pass
Roosevelt failed when he tried it. Likewise with an impeachment of Thomas. I'm afraid we are stuck with them until some die off. Please stop blaming Democrats for things that are beyond their control. If we get a majority of Congress back we might be able to do something about the Fascist presidential immunity ruling.