Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(170,781 posts)
Mon Oct 6, 2025, 09:55 AM 13 hrs ago

Supreme Court rejects Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal of her criminal conviction

Now this criminal has to wait until her fellow criminal issues a pardon

Supreme Court rejects Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell’s appeal of her criminal conviction

Maxwell was convicted for her role in recruiting and grooming girls who were sexually abused by Jeffrey Epstein.

www.nbcnews.com/politics/sup...

Raymond Norman (@raymondnorman.bsky.social) 2025-10-06T13:43:10.535Z

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-rejects-epstein-associate-ghislaine-maxwells-appeal-crim-rcna233281
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday rejected Ghislaine Maxwell’s challenge to her criminal conviction for recruiting and grooming teenage girls for sexual abuse by Jeffrey Epstein.

The decision means that Maxwell’s conviction on three counts and her 20-year criminal sentence remain in place.

Maxwell’s lawyer David Oscar Markus argued in court papers that an agreement Epstein made with prosecutors in Florida, in which the then-U.S. attorney pledged not to prosecute him or potential co-conspirators, should apply to one of the three counts in her case, which was prosecuted in New York.

"We’re, of course, deeply disappointed that the Supreme Court declined to hear Ghislaine Maxwell’s case," Markus said in a statement. "But this fight isn’t over. Serious legal and factual issues remain, and we will continue to pursue every avenue available to ensure that justice is done," he added.

At issue in Maxwell’s appeal was whether the terms of a so-called nonprosecution agreement apply only in the district where it was negotiated or also bind federal prosecutors nationwide.
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court rejects Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal of her criminal conviction (Original Post) LetMyPeopleVote 13 hrs ago OP
Deadline Legal Blog-Supreme Court won't review Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal, which cited Epstein agreement LetMyPeopleVote 12 hrs ago #1
Im not a lawyer, so i have questions: Volaris 12 hrs ago #2

LetMyPeopleVote

(170,781 posts)
1. Deadline Legal Blog-Supreme Court won't review Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal, which cited Epstein agreement
Mon Oct 6, 2025, 10:39 AM
12 hrs ago

Last edited Mon Oct 6, 2025, 02:51 PM - Edit history (1)

The convicted sex trafficker invoked Jeffrey Epstein’s infamous non-prosecution agreement that barred prosecuting his co-conspirators.

Supreme Court won’t review Ghislaine Maxwell’s appeal, which cited Epstein agreement www.msnbc.com/deadline-whi...

Minka (@minkab.bsky.social) 2025-10-06T14:35:08.693Z

https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/ghislaine-maxwell-appeal-supreme-court-epstein-trump-rcna235391

The Supreme Court declined to review Ghislaine Maxwell’s appeal, in a rejection that could keep the sex trafficker locked up for another decade if President Donald Trump doesn’t grant her clemency.....

The federal Bureau of Prisons lists Maxwell’s release date as July 17, 2037. The 63-year-old was moved to a minimum-security facility after she had an unusual meeting this summer with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche (a former Trump personal lawyer), during which she said she never saw Trump do anything “inappropriate.” Her conviction followed Epstein’s 2019 death in custody while he was being held on his own related charges.

Monday’s denial comes amid political fallout from the Trump administration’s attempts to fend off intense backlash to its refusal to release all the information it has on the late disgraced financier.

The legal argument in Maxwell’s petition centered on Epstein’s notorious non-prosecution agreement in Florida that said, in part, that “the United States also agrees that it will not institute any criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein.” She argued that the agreement should have applied to her New York case. The Trump Justice Department opposed high court review, arguing, among other things, that the agreement wasn’t intended to bind districts outside of Florida.

Maxwell had urged the justices to take her case not only to resolve her appeal but also to settle a split among the nation’s courts about how to interpret such agreements. The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers backed her appeal, asking the justices to grant review and “resolve the split among the circuits and ensure that defendants and their counsel can rely on the promises made by the United States in its written agreements.”

Volaris

(11,098 posts)
2. Im not a lawyer, so i have questions:
Mon Oct 6, 2025, 10:46 AM
12 hrs ago

Does this mean that the non-pros agreement is ONLY valid in SDFlorida, and other jurisdictions CAN indict co-conspiritors, or did the SC just reject it out of hand as otherwise not worth their time, etc, and leave that question open?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Supreme Court rejects Eps...