Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFederal judge blocks any deployment of National Guard to Portland
This is fast
BREAKING: Federal judge blocks any deployment of National Guard to Portland www.cnn.com/2025/10/05/u...
— Ben Edwards (@bostonhistory.bsky.social) 2025-10-06T03:58:30.817Z
https://www.cnn.com/2025/10/05/us/oregon-trump-california-national-guard
A federal judge on Sunday temporarily blocked the Trump administration from sending any National Guard troops to Portland. The ruling comes after the Trump administration moved to send the California National Guard to Portland after the judge earlier denied sending Oregon National Guard troops.
What was unlawful with the Oregon National Guard is unlawful with the California National Guard, Attorney General Dan Rayfield said in a news conference before the ruling. The judges order was not some minor procedural point for the president to work around like my 14-year-old does when he doesnt like my answers.
The state amended its original complaint against calling up the Oregon National Guard in federal district court and filed for a second temporary restraining order to pause the presidents actions.
In response to the amended complaint, White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson said in a statement, The facts havent changed: President Trump exercised his lawful authority to protect federal assets and personnel in Portland following violent riots and attacks on law enforcement.
US District Judge Karin Immergut granted a temporary restraining order Saturday blocking President Donald Trump from sending the Oregon National Guard to Portland, the states largest city, ruling that city and state officials are likely to succeed on their claim that the President exceeded his constitutional authority and violated the Tenth Amendment in ordering the deployment.
What was unlawful with the Oregon National Guard is unlawful with the California National Guard, Attorney General Dan Rayfield said in a news conference before the ruling. The judges order was not some minor procedural point for the president to work around like my 14-year-old does when he doesnt like my answers.
The state amended its original complaint against calling up the Oregon National Guard in federal district court and filed for a second temporary restraining order to pause the presidents actions.
In response to the amended complaint, White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson said in a statement, The facts havent changed: President Trump exercised his lawful authority to protect federal assets and personnel in Portland following violent riots and attacks on law enforcement.
US District Judge Karin Immergut granted a temporary restraining order Saturday blocking President Donald Trump from sending the Oregon National Guard to Portland, the states largest city, ruling that city and state officials are likely to succeed on their claim that the President exceeded his constitutional authority and violated the Tenth Amendment in ordering the deployment.
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Federal judge blocks any deployment of National Guard to Portland (Original Post)
LetMyPeopleVote
23 hrs ago
OP
Mme. Defarge
(8,792 posts)1. Now I think I can sleep tonight.
LetMyPeopleVote
(170,781 posts)2. This judge is pissed and acted very quickly
This judge is pissed and acted very quickly because trump was trying to ignore her prior order
Link to tweet

UTUSN
(75,932 posts)3. K&R
yellow dahlia
(3,306 posts)4. The Rule of Law is still out there.
Bayard
(27,278 posts)5. I like the 14 year old kid analogy
Very apt.
Bravo, Judge Immergut, again!