Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(129,081 posts)
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 02:32 PM Saturday

Social Security Benefits Cuts Are Now an Estimated 7 Years Away, and Trump's "Big, Booty Full Bill" Is Partly to Blame

In May, the average monthly Social Security retired-worker benefit made history by topping $2,000 for the first time in the program's storied history. Though this isn't a payment that's going to make aging workers rich, it has proved vital to helping them make ends meet.

Based on an analysis from the nonpartisan Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, the poverty rate for retirees aged 62 and over would jump from 10.1% (as of 2023) to an estimated 37.3% if Social Security didn't exist. Separate annual surveys from Gallup covering almost a quarter of a century have shown that 80% to 90% of retirees rely on their monthly Social Security income, in some capacity, to cover their expenses.

Maintaining the financial health of Social Security should be of the utmost importance for our nation's elected officials. Unfortunately, the foundation of America's leading social program is crumbling. While it's in no danger of disappearing or going bankrupt, the existing payout schedule, including near-annual cost-of-living adjustments, is very much at risk.

There are a lot of reasons for the program's projected shortfall, which has the potential for sweeping benefit cuts of up to 23% for retired workers and the survivors of deceased workers just seven years from now. One of those puzzle pieces of blame is President Donald Trump's flagship tax and spending law, the "Big, Beautiful Bill."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/retirement/social-security-benefits-cuts-are-now-an-estimated-7-years-away-and-president-donald-trump-s-big-beautiful-bill-is-partly-to-blame/ar-AA1NpdrF

You old farts need to get off your dead asses and get to work. - The GOP

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Silent Type

(11,261 posts)
1. Should have thought of all this back when Obama tried to do something about the looming SS deficit and cuts.
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 02:51 PM
Saturday

He was bashed mercilessly by Democrats even when his committee suggested increasing benefits for those on lowest end of Social Security benefits.

So here we are, maybe faced with GOPers deciding if anything would be done before the automatic cuts.

Igel

(37,124 posts)
4. No, it didn't. Anything that increases outflow reduces the trust fund's longevity. n/t
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 05:39 PM
Saturday

ImNotGod

(1,146 posts)
3. SS is already crumbs left over by the rich, the seeds US sparrows pick out of their horseshit. It's a joke
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 02:58 PM
Saturday

Recipients need a raise, not cuts. Fascism needs to be destroyed by any means possible.

gulliver

(13,520 posts)
5. Dems must be waiting for 2028 or 2032 on this
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 06:42 PM
Saturday

At least I hope that's what they're doing. We haven't heard a lot about the fact that the BBB moved the threat of social security cuts a year closer.

But, let's say it's 2032, and the Republicans just decide they're going to let Social Security benefits be cut by 20%. What do you think would happen to them in the election?

wishstar

(5,781 posts)
6. Don't see why it has to be only govt program that's totally self-supporting
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 06:54 PM
Saturday

while all the other programs are allowed to pay out millions or billions running up the deficit without taking in any dedicated revenue.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Social Security Benefits ...