Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pat_k

(11,873 posts)
Thu Sep 25, 2025, 05:52 PM Thursday

Republicans want to cut your healthcare so badly, they'll shut down the government to do it.

Suggestions on the messages to hammer from Tamara Massengale Miro @UnmuteAlabama

https://sez.us/l/4nt9r15k

How I’m Talking About the Shutdown

The news makes it sound like a procedural fight in Washington. Meetings canceled. Deadlines looming. Continuing resolutions. Yawn.

Here’s what I’m saying: Republicans want to cut health care so badly, they’re willing to shut down the government to get it done.

This isn’t about Beltway squabbles. It’s about whether families can afford to see a doctor.

Medicaid is facing the biggest cuts in U.S. history.

ACA tax credits are expiring, which means premiums could jump by an average of 75%.

Medicare is on the chopping block for more than $500 billion in cuts.

Hospitals, rural clinics, even children’s cancer research could lose funding.


When you talk about the shutdown, don’t start with politics. Start with people.

This shutdown isn’t just “government dysfunction.” It’s a health care crisis manufactured on purpose.

👉 The “how” matters.

Say “Republicans want to cut your health care so badly…” instead of “Democrats and Republicans can’t agree.”

Say “millions of families will lose coverage” instead of “funding lapses.”

Say “research into children’s cancer will stop” instead of “budget line items.”


If we lead with the human cost, the politics takes care of itself.


And an additional suggestion from Anat Shenker Osario (Freedom Over Fascism toolkit):

Refuse to frame it as a government shutdown fight. Frame it as refusing to be an accomplice to turning the government into a weapon against the people.


I think that message can be pulled in by saying things like:

We refuse to be accomplices in the biggest cuts to Medicaid in U.S. history.

We refuse to be accomplices to increasing healthcare premiums for 75 million Americans by an average of 75%.

We will not be accomplices to the Republican Congress's cowardly refusal to demand that Trump stop breaking his oath of office and carry out the laws passed by Congress.


54 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Republicans want to cut your healthcare so badly, they'll shut down the government to do it. (Original Post) pat_k Thursday OP
Yep.............. Lovie777 Thursday #1
Democrats will cheer. Republicans will say, "Who care?" We are split 50/50, so not sure we'll prevail. Silent Type Thursday #2
Trump's "coalition" has collapsed pat_k Thursday #5
No, we're not 50/50 paleotn Thursday #6
Guess you don't trust polls? Please provide a citation of your trope that it is50/50. Silent Type Thursday #19
His approval rating is a "tad" below 50%, no? paleotn Thursday #23
I'd call 40% Approve 60% Disapprove more than a "tad" pat_k Thursday #27
I was being facetious with the "tad" comment. paleotn Friday #51
Opps. Me being a tad dense. pat_k Friday #52
When over 90 million voters sat out of the last election, over a 3rd, then roughly 60% voted and 51% of them R Cheezoholic Thursday #24
Look at the results for 2024. What was trump's percentage of votes, not to mention losing both chambers. Silent Type Thursday #31
Your statement this country is 50/50 is false. If anything we're 50/50 of those who vote and those who dont Cheezoholic Thursday #35
of course we're not. pat_k Thursday #21
If the Dems don't give in and won't refuse anything less BigmanPigman Thursday #3
Just need to message it properly. paleotn Thursday #7
We, the base, are messengers too. And we can get it right. And push our electeds to do a better job. pat_k Thursday #25
I love this message. Scrivener7 Thursday #30
Thanks! Perhaps you'll like my follow-up too. pat_k Thursday #34
P.S. I suggest you subscribe to Ariella Elm's substack. pat_k Thursday #33
Yes to this mountain grammy Thursday #46
Glad this inspired a big Yes! pat_k Thursday #47
Also Help Point Out How Many People Will Lose Their Jobs modrepub Thursday #4
Yes. I need to take some time to see if CBO, or other entities, have good estimates of ripple effects... pat_k Thursday #36
If only a shutdown would shut down ICE... Wounded Bear Thursday #8
That is for a future battle. pat_k Thursday #37
K&R B.See Thursday #9
Thanks! pat_k Friday #53
Good message, too bad you can't fit "people will die" somewhere in there. Fil1957 Thursday #10
Oh, I think you can. pat_k Thursday #38
Great post! Thank you! ancianita Thursday #11
Thanks! If you have other socials, perhaps post there too! pat_k Friday #54
And it all to take from those who need jobs and health care IbogaProject Thursday #12
I'm a little unclear about how demands to maintain full appropriations for Medicaid... pat_k Thursday #39
Wut? IbogaProject Friday #48
Of course. But appropriation bills and CR's don't.. pat_k Friday #49
Ah, I was talking about public messaging IbogaProject Friday #50
This is great stuff. Ready to call and write my sleazy FL legislators with these, and share with everyone I meet. Timeflyer Thursday #13
So glad to hear it inspired you to action. It did the same for me. (nt) pat_k Thursday #40
Slow genocide. moondust Thursday #14
That is our message. mountain grammy Thursday #15
Hear! Hear! And if you have a Democratic Rep, or if either (or both) Senators are Dems, send them the message. pat_k Thursday #45
In MAGA World, cutting healthcare is "good" while trying to save it is "liberal extremism." n/t Beartracks Thursday #16
I'm a liberal extremist BOSSHOG Thursday #20
There are plenty in MAGA world receiving those "enhanced ACA subsidies" pat_k Thursday #41
"When you talk about the shutdown, don't start with politics. Start with people." Beartracks Thursday #17
Frame it as unwilling to be an acquiescent accomplice. BattleRow Thursday #18
I may be in a minority here ... Metaphorical Thursday #22
I totally agree. But I think an important part of our strategy should be to spread the message in the OP Scrivener7 Thursday #28
This woman is talented. I hope all our reps listen to this and do what she says. Scrivener7 Thursday #26
She is. I've found all of her contributions over on Sez.Us extremely valuable. pat_k Thursday #43
All republicans have to do is say it's for immigrants...... Lovie777 Thursday #29
And we counter that with more powerful messages. It's time for US, Not Them, to create "Reality." pat_k Thursday #44
Republicans Shut the Government Down because Epstein! PuraVidaDreamin Thursday #32
Republicans want non-billionaires to DIE so that they won't VOTE! Jack Valentino Thursday #42

Silent Type

(11,256 posts)
2. Democrats will cheer. Republicans will say, "Who care?" We are split 50/50, so not sure we'll prevail.
Thu Sep 25, 2025, 05:57 PM
Thursday

Guess it is worth a try though since it's about only card we have.

pat_k

(11,873 posts)
5. Trump's "coalition" has collapsed
Thu Sep 25, 2025, 06:17 PM
Thursday

Recent polls.

https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=20670408

And if there is anything we can bet on, it's that the regime will handle this as incompetently as they have handled everything else

There is a reason support for everything he does has plummeted. Already GOP folks are talking about "missteps" in their approach to the budget deadline.

pat_k

(11,873 posts)
27. I'd call 40% Approve 60% Disapprove more than a "tad"
Thu Sep 25, 2025, 08:26 PM
Thursday

And it gets worse when you look at approval / disapproval on things like the economy or free speech.

Approve-Disapprove

39%-60% (-21) AP-NORC

38%-59% (-21) ARG

39%-56% (-17) Economist/YouGov (this week)

40%-56% (-16) Gallup

43%-56% (-13) WaPo/Ipsos

42%-55% (-13) Strength In Numbers/Verasign



And on the topic of Free Speech: 35%-55%

Cheezoholic

(3,313 posts)
24. When over 90 million voters sat out of the last election, over a 3rd, then roughly 60% voted and 51% of them R
Thu Sep 25, 2025, 08:20 PM
Thursday

Last edited Thu Sep 25, 2025, 09:02 PM - Edit history (1)

then roughly a 3rd of repukes actually identify as MAGAts your 50/50 mark is way way off. If if my numbers are slightly off, your estimation is still completely out in left field.

Silent Type

(11,256 posts)
31. Look at the results for 2024. What was trump's percentage of votes, not to mention losing both chambers.
Thu Sep 25, 2025, 08:32 PM
Thursday

Hope you guys are planning on running on we won in 2016, 2024.

Cheezoholic

(3,313 posts)
35. Your statement this country is 50/50 is false. If anything we're 50/50 of those who vote and those who dont
Thu Sep 25, 2025, 08:59 PM
Thursday

Only about 1/3rd of ELIGIBLE voters voted for him. This is what happens when people do not participate. 75 million people make the decisions for 250 million eligible voters and 330 million people overall. Saying we are "50/50" as a country is not only wrong, it gives him more credit than he even came close to deserving. Until we can get people involved again small minorities of voters will continue to make the decisions for all of us which of course is what the R's want. They could seldom win a toy duck if we could get 65% of eligible voters to actually vote.

pat_k

(11,873 posts)
21. of course we're not.
Thu Sep 25, 2025, 08:09 PM
Thursday

Just for starters, roughly seven in ten Americans qualify as Christian nationalism Rejecters or Skeptics.

Breakdown:
Christian nationalism
Skeptics (37%)
or Rejecters (30%)
Adherents (10%)
Sympathizers (20%)

And note that Adherents are a mere 10%. That is the steadfast Charlie Kirk (and all the other Christian Nationalist demagogues) supporters.

https://prri.org/research/resistance-to-christian-nationalism-in-all-50-states/

Yes, some serious work is needed to combat the cynicism, "to hell with both your houses" opting out, and demonization of "government" as some evil, alien entity, instead of what it is, OURS to shape, that has handed power to insane people by attrition. But this nation is Not 50% MAGA.

BigmanPigman

(53,835 posts)
3. If the Dems don't give in and won't refuse anything less
Thu Sep 25, 2025, 05:59 PM
Thursday

their constituents will reward them at the next election.

pat_k

(11,873 posts)
25. We, the base, are messengers too. And we can get it right. And push our electeds to do a better job.
Thu Sep 25, 2025, 08:21 PM
Thursday

The simple messages suggested by @UnmuteAlabama are a good start for emailing the Democratic Leadership. And if your U.S. Rep and either or both of your U.S. Senators are Dems, they need to hear from you too. Call, ask them if there is a coordinated communications strategy on their refusal to be complicit in implementing the MAGA Murder Budget, and if so, what are the core, simple, messages, and how can you help? If they can't articulate a simple message, challenge them to SIMPLIFY. If they aren't planning daily press conferences on the capital steps and appearances on EVERY NETWORK (including FOX), they need to step it up.

The big message. Keep it SIMPLE! Repeat the same simple things until they are sick of hearing themselves say it, and then repeat some more. ONLY then do they have a shot at breaking through.

If our Democratic electeds have a problem, it's that some of them seem to think that if they said something once in a statement or press release, that's it. Done and dusted. They have something to refer to.

pat_k

(11,873 posts)
33. P.S. I suggest you subscribe to Ariella Elm's substack.
Thu Sep 25, 2025, 08:48 PM
Thursday

Pay attention to the regular "Daily Dems Doing the Work, Making Noise and Fighting Back Day xxx" summaries, like this one:
https://ariellaelm.substack.com/p/daily-dems-doing-the-work-making-547

Frankly, it's a learning curve. Going from being legislators -- which is what most of them consider their "job" is, to using their offices to coordinate on a 24x7 Communications Operation, doesn't happen overnight.

Should they have gotten their shit together sooner? Sure. More of them should be holding more town meetings in Republican districts, holding shadow hearings. They should be rotating leadership appearances on EVERY network (including FOX). More of them should be out there raising money not just for their own next election, but for State Parties that desperately need funds to build operational infrastructure NOW to start reaching out to and actually LISTENING TO “lost” voters. The model of parachuting in in the last weeks for a specific candidate is a losing proposition.

Pretending that NONE of them is stepping up is counter-resistance disinformation. And that is something that every patriot who opposes this regime needs to f-ing STOP. Hope is the life's blood of resistance as much as lies are the life's blood of authoritarians.

You are a messenger. We ALL are. Think about what you post. Even if posting a criticism, have you bothered to dig a little deeper to find something to add that inspires hope? If not, if you care about actually winning this fight, I suggest you consider finding ways to keep your own hope alive, and find ways to make sure you call on others to do the same.

mountain grammy

(28,242 posts)
46. Yes to this
Thu Sep 25, 2025, 10:33 PM
Thursday

And the message is Medicaid and the gutting of it by republicans. Hammer them with it!

modrepub

(3,934 posts)
4. Also Help Point Out How Many People Will Lose Their Jobs
Thu Sep 25, 2025, 06:16 PM
Thursday

because of these cuts. Probably proportionally higher in rural areas would be my guess.

pat_k

(11,873 posts)
36. Yes. I need to take some time to see if CBO, or other entities, have good estimates of ripple effects...
Thu Sep 25, 2025, 09:03 PM
Thursday

... like emergency room closures, entire hospital closures, seniors losing long-term care placements, long-term care facilities closing...

We don't want to overwhelm with estimates, but a few numbers to make the case that this isn't just about some "low income" people losing their health insurance. It is about ALL OF US paying the price in less care, more expensive care, and in places already failing to serve the public, new "health care deserts."

pat_k

(11,873 posts)
37. That is for a future battle.
Thu Sep 25, 2025, 09:17 PM
Thursday

I think they needed to pick their battles. If some concessions on healthcare are extracted, and guarantees that 47 follows the law (should be unnecessary given that he is already bound by oath, but oh well) and Republicans are unwilling to scale back on the 900 billion dollar windfall to the top 1% over 10 years* in the MAGA Murder Budget, perhaps they can carve out some dollars from the ICE budget.

A gal can dream.

*While this is not an estimate that has been published by the CBO, I'm taking the estimate of the number of people in the top 1% (1.5 million) x the estimated average annual windfall for that group of 64,000 x 10 years.

pat_k

(11,873 posts)
38. Oh, I think you can.
Thu Sep 25, 2025, 09:21 PM
Thursday

We (as in me and perhaps some other intrepid reader of this post) need to connect a few dots I haven't seen connected yet to justify an unequivocal assertion.

IbogaProject

(5,032 posts)
12. And it all to take from those who need jobs and health care
Thu Sep 25, 2025, 07:09 PM
Thursday

To give extra to the already wealthy. Don't neglect the class element. Trying to craft business friendly centrist campaigns has gotten us into this mess, we ceeded the center to them by giving up progressiveness.

pat_k

(11,873 posts)
39. I'm a little unclear about how demands to maintain full appropriations for Medicaid...
Thu Sep 25, 2025, 09:34 PM
Thursday

... and keeping the enhanced ACA subsidy can be tied to a roll back of the 900 billion windfall for the top 1% that is in the MAGA murder budget as part of the budget to fund the government for the next fiscal year.

Obviously, if concessions are won on maintaining Medicaid appropriations and extending the appropriations to continue the enhanced ACA subsidies, there would be a call for those dollars to be offset, but I think they may be leaving the tax cuts out of the argument for the moment. They can only filibuster the next budget until that budget includes things that would effectively "repeal" parts of the MAGA Murder Budget, but they aren't taking on that the entire mess that was passed.

Frankly, I think they are smart to avoid getting "lost" in the forest. They are just going after key "trees."

IbogaProject

(5,032 posts)
48. Wut?
Fri Sep 26, 2025, 01:09 AM
Friday

If they had to cut medicaid and the ACA both job creators and great lifesavers for many, than those tax cuts for tge 1% are class theft. The 1% by definition have enough. The whole Big Beutiful Scam bill is ~4.5 Trillion over 10 years. And the cuts are pushed into the later part of the decade beyond the sooner health cuts in addition to the government jobs culling. The greedy wealthy are hurting the rest of us is actually an easier sell than hey help these needy people. We need to push the serious detail that these tax cuts for the already comfortable slow the economy as they can't and dont spend their money quick and local the way most of us do. The wealthy shuffle it amonst their inbred circle trading art, extra homes, property and other luxury
items and often in far away spaces later on. Joe Public can understand tge 1% didn't need extra if it means cuts to job creating services like health care, research.

pat_k

(11,873 posts)
49. Of course. But appropriation bills and CR's don't..
Fri Sep 26, 2025, 02:22 AM
Friday

...normally address revenue (tax cuts/increases). They are focused only on approving government spending/appropriations for the upcoming fiscal year (or some shorter-term). CR's and appropriation bills require 60 votes in the Senate to be sent to the floor for a vote. That is why the Republicans now require Democratic votes to actually make the cuts in spending for the upcoming year that they included in their MAGA Murder Budget reconciliation plan.

The MAGA Murder Budget was a reconciliation package that doesn't require 60 for cloture. It addressed both revenue (tax increases/cuts) and the plan for where the revenue would go (spending/appropriations). To pass it they only needed a majority. But to actually implement the spending side -- the appropriations, they need 60. Which is why reconciliation packages are not NORMALLY shoved down the throats of the minority party. You need them to implement it.

Anyway, I just mentioned that I'm unclear about how rolling back tax cuts could be tied in because this is an appropriations showdown.

IbogaProject

(5,032 posts)
50. Ah, I was talking about public messaging
Fri Sep 26, 2025, 09:00 AM
Friday

Tangerine Ceaser is going on how we want to waste money on health care for "illegal aliens". So I feel we have to counter that as the cuts are to pay for Larry Ellison to buy Tic Tok and for that ilk to take yet more. I now understand how the GOP is muscling this through and how while we have leverage the noose of the recent tax package will remain.

Timeflyer

(3,441 posts)
13. This is great stuff. Ready to call and write my sleazy FL legislators with these, and share with everyone I meet.
Thu Sep 25, 2025, 07:13 PM
Thursday

pat_k

(11,873 posts)
40. So glad to hear it inspired you to action. It did the same for me. (nt)
Thu Sep 25, 2025, 09:35 PM
Thursday

Last edited Thu Sep 25, 2025, 11:29 PM - Edit history (1)

pat_k

(11,873 posts)
45. Hear! Hear! And if you have a Democratic Rep, or if either (or both) Senators are Dems, send them the message.
Thu Sep 25, 2025, 10:27 PM
Thursday

Last edited Fri Sep 26, 2025, 12:11 PM - Edit history (1)

More in a previous reply:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220675016#post25

Beartracks

(14,117 posts)
16. In MAGA World, cutting healthcare is "good" while trying to save it is "liberal extremism." n/t
Thu Sep 25, 2025, 07:33 PM
Thursday

BOSSHOG

(43,732 posts)
20. I'm a liberal extremist
Thu Sep 25, 2025, 07:58 PM
Thursday

Billionaires don’t need bigger yachts. Do MAGAs need MEDICARE and MEDICAID? Do republicans in DC have or want spines?

pat_k

(11,873 posts)
41. There are plenty in MAGA world receiving those "enhanced ACA subsidies"
Thu Sep 25, 2025, 09:38 PM
Thursday

Last edited Fri Sep 26, 2025, 12:12 PM - Edit history (1)

I think hearing that their monthly premium will increase by 75% (on average) may ring some bells.

Beartracks

(14,117 posts)
17. "When you talk about the shutdown, don't start with politics. Start with people."
Thu Sep 25, 2025, 07:35 PM
Thursday

"This shutdown isn’t just 'government dysfunction.' It’s a health care crisis manufactured on purpose."

Yes. Yes. Yes.

==================

Metaphorical

(2,522 posts)
22. I may be in a minority here ...
Thu Sep 25, 2025, 08:11 PM
Thursday

but I think that the Democrats should frankly let the GOP shut it down.

We have come to the rescue of the GOP too many times. The ones who voted for Trump and his resident Nazis wanted this, wanted to prove that just how bad government was, and we've tried being responsible every time, even as we've been villified for it.

People are going to get hurt, quite probably people will die. Point is that the Trump-loving MAGA party will own this, completely and totally.

If the government shuts down, all of those Trump-loving MAGA will lose their disability checks, their social security, their government funding private contracts, their farm subsidies. The Blue states in general will be able to survive, even if with reduced income. The Red states will collapse.

This is unfortunate, especially for those Democrats and independents who live in those red states, but I think it will also have several follow-on effects. I think it's going to cause a lot of state constituencies to vote the GOP out regardless of any gerrymandering. It's going to cause a general strike that I suspect will likely topple other states. It also may very well force some serious discussion about whether the US continues in its current form.

Scrivener7

(57,300 posts)
28. I totally agree. But I think an important part of our strategy should be to spread the message in the OP
Thu Sep 25, 2025, 08:27 PM
Thursday

far and wide.

Things will not get better until people are really hurting. And in the meantime, we need to be reminding who is hurting them and why they are doing it.

This is a great message.

pat_k

(11,873 posts)
43. She is. I've found all of her contributions over on Sez.Us extremely valuable.
Thu Sep 25, 2025, 09:50 PM
Thursday

And she's doing on-the-ground work in a very Red state.

You can review previous posts from her over there on her profile page:
https://sez.us/user/UnmuteAlabama

I've suggested DU to posters like her, but so far I haven't seen her here.

And if you do check out Sez.Us, remember that it is early days over there (The interface is a work in progress, but there are some valuable/interesting "regulars." )

If you aren't familiar, here's their about page:
https://sez.us/about

Lovie777

(20,465 posts)
29. All republicans have to do is say it's for immigrants......
Thu Sep 25, 2025, 08:27 PM
Thursday

while screwing their contingency and blaming Dems.

pat_k

(11,873 posts)
44. And we counter that with more powerful messages. It's time for US, Not Them, to create "Reality."
Thu Sep 25, 2025, 10:03 PM
Thursday

And we have the advantage. The reality we are creating is actually REALITY.

Undocumented Immigrants ARE NOT eligible for Medicaid or ACA under federal law. It is a matter of STATES RIGHTS. States who have found that it serves ALL their residents to extend coverage are doing it because they KNOW it would cost hospitals FAR MORE for emergency treatment of the uninsured (which is required in EVERY STATE).

And as far as insurance coverage for Trans People. That too is a matter of STATES RIGHTS. And in America, states that stand with American Values provide coverage for gender affirming care because they believe Each and Everyone of Us should be afforded the FREEDOM to be who we are.

Anti-MAGA people MUST stop letting trans people be tossed under the bus. There is GREAT messaging on this in Anat Shenker Osario's Freedom Over Fascism Toolkit. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1s0JbXhND7-1iqABNcUNL031NQLxkLfr-USkCKGZTidI/edit?tab=t.0


Jack Valentino

(3,369 posts)
42. Republicans want non-billionaires to DIE so that they won't VOTE!
Thu Sep 25, 2025, 09:45 PM
Thursday

That's what it boils down to...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Republicans want to cut y...