General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGeorgia's Medicaid Work Requirement Program Spent Twice as Much on Administrative Costs as on Health Care, GAO Says
Republican lawmakers cite Georgias Pathways to Coverage as a national model for federal Medicaid work requirements that are set to take effect in 2027. A new report shows the program has spent at least $54 million on administrative costs alone.
Most of the tax dollars used to launch and implement the nations only Medicaid work requirement program have gone toward paying administrative costs rather than covering health care for Georgians, according to a new report by the Government Accountability Office, the nonpartisan agency that monitors federal programs and spending.
The government report examined administrative expenses for Georgia Pathways to Coverage, the states experiment with work requirements. It follows previous reporting by The Current and ProPublica showing that the program has cost federal and state taxpayers more than $86.9 million while enrolling a tiny fraction of those eligible for free health care.
The GAO analysis, which does not include all the Pathways administrative expenses detailed by the news outlets, shows that as of April the Georgia program had spent $54.2 million on administrative costs since 2021, compared to $26.1 million spent on health care costs. Nearly 90% of administrative expenditures came from the federal budget, the report concluded, meaning that Georgias experiment is being funded by taxpayers around the country. Federal spending will likely increase given that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has approved $6 million more in administrative costs not reflected in this report because it was published before the state submitted invoices.
More at:
https://www.propublica.org/article/georgia-pathways-medicaid-work-requirement-gao-report?utm_source=firefox-newtab-en-us

Irish_Dem
(75,383 posts)Coldwater
(220 posts)to enact similar programs
dutch777
(4,724 posts)one has to wonder how many will be suitable to work or be able to find any they can do or are available? Given that the Trump regime seems disinterested in gathering actual facts I am sure they will just blindly ignore the true impediments recipients face and cut them off summarily anyway. All while declaring victory and releasing no factual data. Recipients will have no choice but to use the local ERs as their primary care and further over burden hospitals with clogged ERs and more no pay patients.
exboyfil
(18,299 posts)I had multiple meetings scheduled and two were at the same time. Even my current employer was hounded regarding verification (i didn't appreciate that at all starting out a new job). Even months later I received a notice telling me I wasn't complying with the process (months after I notified them I had a new position and wasn't filing any more claims). I even had to call in on a meeting and my current HR rep would either have to call in or give their response.
This to go along with the fact that I still had to apply for positions why I was awaiting getting into the door at my new employer (drug check). I felt bad about contacting those companies without having any intention of following up with them.
leftstreet
(37,376 posts)This is how they grift