General Discussion

Miles Archer

(20,310 posts) Wed Sep 24, 2025, 11:54 AM Wednesday

Sinclair's "conditions" for re-airing Kimmel are laughable, and would end his career if he caved (I believe he WON'T).

They want Kimmel to

"issue a direct apology to the Kirk family," and to "make a meaningful personal donation to the Kirk Family and Turning Point USA."

That is directly from the Sinclair website. I didn't provide a link BECAUSE it is Sinclair, and didn't provide any content beyond the two "demands" because...well, "Republican Talking Points."

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Sinclair's "conditions" for re-airing Kimmel are laughable, and would end his career if he caved (I believe he WON'T). (Original Post) Miles Archer Wednesday OP

I'd bet money Kimmel will be back on Sinclair within a few weeks. Unless folks like Celebrity Feud or something. Silent Type Wednesday #1

The only statement Kimmel should EVER make for Sinclair is this... Moostache Wednesday #2

He was more sincere last night and tearful Tree Lady Wednesday #3

Silent Type

(11,258 posts)

1. I'd bet money Kimmel will be back on Sinclair within a few weeks. Unless folks like Celebrity Feud or something.

Reply to Miles Archer (Original post)

Wed Sep 24, 2025, 11:57 AM

Wednesday

Moostache

(10,814 posts)

2. The only statement Kimmel should EVER make for Sinclair is this...

Reply to Miles Archer (Original post)

Wed Sep 24, 2025, 12:02 PM

Wednesday

You can all cordially suck my ass for the apology and humiliation you seek.
I am not giving one more second of time to you and your perversions of my words, actions or intentions.

By the way, where are the Epstein-Trump files? When will Sinclair be calling for complete transparency and divulging of those?

Tree Lady

(12,758 posts)

3. He was more sincere last night and tearful

Reply to Miles Archer (Original post)

Wed Sep 24, 2025, 12:05 PM

Wednesday

Than I have seen any of the rightwing bent on hate and anger.

They wouldn't know true Christianity if Jesus told them about it.

Reply to this discussion