General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis message was self-deleted by its author
This message was self-deleted by its author (UTUSN) on Tue Sep 23, 2025, 11:04 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.

SickOfTheOnePct
(8,670 posts)...especially with the voice repeatedly talking about cancellation, when his show wasn't canceled.
UTUSN
(75,821 posts)I'll start with the due diligence with the YouTube (channel?) it came from (I only saw the KIMMEL on my miscellaneous YouTube feed), and let our DUer experts decide whether it's AI. But even if it is, its content isn't uncharacteristic or harmful of KIMMEL, yet I'll self-delete if it's AI. 203 videos, hmmm, lots of work, making a living? Otherwise, if only harmless threads could be allowed - free speech? - to sink like rocks on their own without help.
*********QUOTE*****
https://www.youtube.com/@Mickey.noticias/shorts
(logo of probably Copyrighted Mickey Mouse)
Description
Contact us:udantulip888@outlook.com
More info
www.youtube.com/@Mickey.noticias
United States
Joined Nov 12, 2024
37.6K subscribers
203 videos
31,504,891 views
*********UNQUOTE******
SickOfTheOnePct
(8,670 posts)...but things I look for...
...not from a site that the subject would normally use to release content
...disembodied voiceover for most of the video
...incorrect information (in this case, cancellation mentioned repeatedly)
...quickly moving between clips and photos that don't really relate to the words being spoken
...cartoonish effects added like waterfalls from his eyes, flashing stars, etc.
...a quick Google search to see if any legit sources have published the video
UTUSN
(75,821 posts)And my reference to a "tutorial" was not sincere. But here's submitting to the tutorial that before launching the "AI" allegation a couple of considerations might be entertained:
1- Is there anything untrue or harmful in the item?
2- Can the artist of the item (separate from the purveyor of it) be taken as the artist's opinion, contributing a fresh angle not being seen elsewhere?
3- Does the "AI" allegation contribute anything positive, expose fraud, worth creating the irritation?
********Whole OP here: