Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Mr. Sparkle

(3,495 posts)
Sat Sep 20, 2025, 06:06 AM Sep 20

Federal Judge Strikes Trump Defamation Lawsuit For Being Too Annoying to Read

On Friday, September 19, a federal district judge in Florida struck President Donald Trump’s complaint in his $15 billion defamation lawsuit against The New York Times, four Times reporters, and Penguin Random House, describing the complaint as “decidedly improper and impermissible.” Under Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a complaint is supposed to include “a short and plain statement” alleging enough facts that, if true, could warrant legal relief. The complaint Trump filed on Monday, by contrast, is 85 pages long and reads more like an anthology of his Truth Social posts, with slightly better punctuation.

Most complaints filed in federal courtrooms do not get tossed under Rule 8, but most complaints filed in federal courtrooms do not spend dozens of pages recounting, as Trump’s does, the plaintiff’s “singular brilliance” and “history-making media appearances” in programs like Fallen Champ: The Untold Story of Mike Tyson. Trump’s complaint is also crowded with boasts about his purported magnificence (for example, “President Trump secured the greatest personal and political achievement in American history”) and snipes about legacy media’s anti-Trump bias (for example, “Defendants baselessly hate President Trump in a deranged way”).

Friday’s order, in turn, is full of the judge’s unmasked exhaustion. “As every lawyer knows (or is presumed to know), a complaint is not a public forum for vituperation and invective,” wrote Steven Merryday, a judge appointed by President George H.W. Bush in 1992. “This complaint stands unmistakably and inexcusably athwart the requirements of Rule 8.” Merryday gave Trump 28 days to amend the complaint and come back with something less ridiculous, and not exceeding forty pages. “This action will begin, will continue, and will end in accord with the rules of procedure and in a professional and dignified manner,” he wrote.

more ... https://ballsandstrikes.org/law-politics/trump-nyt-lawsuit-too-annoying-to-read/

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Federal Judge Strikes Trump Defamation Lawsuit For Being Too Annoying to Read (Original Post) Mr. Sparkle Sep 20 OP
Even 40 pages is too generous... Shipwack Sep 20 #1
He told the attorneys what to write and then fired them for failing. Like, well, always. twodogsbarking Sep 20 #2
Ridiculous propaganda is all they have. OldBaldy1701E Sep 20 #3
Keep getting them to submit revised versions ad infinitum Pinback Sep 20 #4
trim the hot air..... and whining. Vthestate Sep 20 #5
Hah! UTUSN Sep 20 #6

Shipwack

(2,866 posts)
1. Even 40 pages is too generous...
Sat Sep 20, 2025, 07:27 AM
Sep 20

Maybe they’ll resubmit the same complaint, but with smaller type and thinner margins?

OldBaldy1701E

(9,132 posts)
3. Ridiculous propaganda is all they have.
Sat Sep 20, 2025, 08:28 AM
Sep 20

I am not sure what the judge is expecting. They will just make the praise and kowtowing shorter in general... that's all they have.

Pinback

(13,404 posts)
4. Keep getting them to submit revised versions ad infinitum
Sat Sep 20, 2025, 08:57 AM
Sep 20

Anything to and dilute their energies and waste their time.

Vthestate

(38 posts)
5. trim the hot air..... and whining.
Sat Sep 20, 2025, 12:13 PM
Sep 20

Habitual litigant ....might be a good idea , after the first 45 words,
to charge a $100 a word to file.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Federal Judge Strikes Tru...