General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJimmy Kimmel is lawyering up.
Jimmy Kimmel was spotted on Thursday afternoon arriving at his lawyers office in Los Angeles, one day after ABC suspended his late night talk show. See more on Just Jared.
#JimmyKimmel
Photos: Backgrid
See more photos: https://www.justjared.com/2025/09/18/jimmy-kimmel-photographed-visiting-his-lawyers-office-after-getting-suspended-from-abc/

SunSeeker
(56,773 posts)It is one of the top entertainment law firms in the country, founded in 1977. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/jackoway-austen-promotes-1235812716/
MrWowWow
(1,369 posts)Hopefully, the SCROTUM-6 won't all side with tr💩mp#
Skittles
(167,709 posts)they've whored for him quite a bit so far
SunSeeker
(56,773 posts)Now granted, it was against a Democratic government official, but just last year the Supreme Court ruled in National Rifle Association v. Vullo that government officials cannot use coercive tactics to suppress disfavored speech, stressing that government officials cannot achieve indirect censorship by threatening private companies (like ABC) to punish certain viewpoints (like Kimmels). It was a unanimous ruling that stated if Maria T. Vullo, the former director of the New York State Department of Financial Services, attempted to coerce financial institutions in the state to refrain from doing business with the National Rifle Association, then such conduct would violate the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.
maxrandb
(16,860 posts)Nixon's, "if a president does it, it's not illegal" defense was a sick joke at one time, now it's policy.
SunSeeker
(56,773 posts)I know the SCOTUS 6 are capable of anything, but it's still worth a try.
LeftInTX
(34,006 posts)I think Jimmie knows that public opinion is strongly in his favor. Business disputes rarely end up at the supreme court. That's because both parties, especially ABC wants to settle this quickly.
LeftInTX
(34,006 posts)How do they answer their phone? LOL
DFW
(58,999 posts)I would probably just answer with Shalom!
Answering with all of the names would cause the firm to be paying their receptionists overtime on a daily basis 😛
SunSeeker
(56,773 posts)Most law firm receptionists just answer with, "Law offices. How may I direct your call?"
But I bet these guys insist that the poor receptionist rattle off the whole name.
LeftInTX
(34,006 posts)It makes them sound cheap.
Skittles
(167,709 posts)
Cha
(314,605 posts)of Jimmy Kimmel! and his buddy!
Jimmy's On IT!!
Mahalo, SunSeeker!
SunSeeker
(56,773 posts)That makes me happy.
Cha
(314,605 posts)my face... Jimmy Kimmel is very inspiring. It kind of reminds me of David and Goliath
Jimmy is brilliant and a real genius.
TY.. so glad to see this.
BigmanPigman
(53,835 posts)from his power grab before the 2026 midterms. He said that the courts and state governors will keep us going up to the midterms which we will win.
The courts will help us so we need to sue tRump every waking moment. Jimmy Kimmel is doing the right thing. Too bad it costs so much money to do so.
Frasier Balzov
(4,580 posts)it's likely to be ABC and Disney.
SunSeeker
(56,773 posts)
Frasier Balzov
(4,580 posts)Word choice and tone of what Carr said.
Existence of regulatory authority.
Understood as a threat.
Implying adverse consequences otherwise.
The above factors are all surely present in Kimmel v. Carr.
What is the remedy? Monetary damages? From whom? Carr under the Federal Tort Claims Act? (Vullo didn't pay anything due to the doctrine of qualified immunity.) The broadcasters who decline to carry Kimmel's show? (They were just responding to a threat by an official whom they perceive can make good on that threat. And broadcasters ultimately get to decide what to carry in their communities for a whole range of legitimate standards they are entrusted to apply.)
Kimmel's lawyers will be negotiating a buyout of his remaining contract with the network wherein ABC absorbs all costs of shutting down including severance pay for the staff.
Part of that settlement with the network might also mean that ABC pursues a principled case against Carr for violation of the First Amendment. This would be a righteous pursuit Kimmel seems like the kind of guy to demand. And, as you point out, having slam-dunk on-point recent precedent available to cite.
Where did you learn of the Vullo decision?
SunSeeker
(56,773 posts)Here's Haake's subststack piece Kos was citing:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220655452
cstanleytech
(27,951 posts)SunSeeker
(56,773 posts)There is no presidential immunity from civil litigation.
LeftInTX
(34,006 posts)I managed to survive watching one of his pressers yesterday and he called him "George Sloppyloppiness" several times.
newdeal2
(4,206 posts)I think Jimmy is going to do one more show and then get paid handsomely to leave. I dont see how he cant trust the network now and I believe his contract ends next year anyway so negotiations will be tough.