Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

paleotn

(20,947 posts)
Fri Sep 19, 2025, 10:15 PM Sep 19

Rumor heard from an old friend. Take it for what it's worth...

Guys asking their CO's for letters absolving them of wrongdoing with regard to the military strikes on Venezuelan boats. Scuttlebutt, granted, but there appears to be rumblings in the ranks. Honestly, I wouldn't be surprised. They're not trained for shit like that. When i served, I can't imagine EVER being ordered to do something like that. It's so beyond the pale.

A legionary solution to end this regime once and for all? Hard to believe, but given the level of criminality, I wouldn't necessarily be opposed. Seems we've fallen a long way. With 3 more years to go unless the bastard dies in office. Something's got to give.

57 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rumor heard from an old friend. Take it for what it's worth... (Original Post) paleotn Sep 19 OP
It was an illegal order and the rank and file know it. Klarkashton Sep 19 #1
I can't disagree. paleotn Sep 19 #2
They have to stop worrying about getting some BS letters and start refusing to obey what they clearly know Liberal In Texas Sep 19 #4
Don't hold your breath. These are between war military Klarkashton Sep 19 #5
And now we know why the JAG Corp was decimated. No one left to go to for help when given illegal orders? Attilatheblond Sep 20 #48
There are still JAGs mahina Sep 20 #50
Yeah, but not nearly as many Attilatheblond Sep 20 #55
A letter doesn't "absolve" one of following an illegal order Prairie Gates Sep 19 #16
Yes it is ridiculous. A letter from your CO doesn't cover you for committing murder. Irish_Dem Sep 20 #35
This Oldvet Sep 20 #49
Didn't I read they shithole gonna.. Lovie777 Sep 19 #3
Trump already did. Klarkashton Sep 19 #7
Being told "no, it really is okay to follow these orders" doesn't absolve one from RockRaven Sep 19 #6
No way is maga congress going to do an investigation . Klarkashton Sep 19 #8
Yes, look at William Callie, markodochartaigh Sep 20 #19
This is not rumor AverageOldGuy Sep 19 #9
He is ramping up his brinksmanship. There will be a breaking point. usonian Sep 20 #26
Can you imagine, after all you've gone through to achieve flag rank. paleotn Sep 20 #34
That is the point. To humiliate and degrade the US military. Irish_Dem Sep 20 #36
In Nuremberg, Nazis who claimed they were just following orders Jarqui Sep 19 #10
Nope canetoad Sep 20 #29
Maybe I did not express myself well Jarqui Sep 20 #31
It doesn't matter - we first need to get to the point where AdamGG Sep 20 #42
They hit another one a couple of hours ago. iemanja Sep 19 #11
Oh no. America just murders now? BlueWaveNeverEnd Sep 19 #13
That is nothing new Lbn2 Sep 20 #56
Welcome to DU LetMyPeopleVote Sep 21 #57
So is this the third boat o dead Venezuelans? n/t ReRe Sep 20 #20
I think so iemanja Sep 20 #21
Holy moley Mother of God. ReRe Sep 20 #23
Trump is incubating counter and surprise strikes all 4 corners of the Earth PufPuf23 Sep 19 #12
No. ReRe Sep 20 #22
Not sure what you mean by "No". PufPuf23 Sep 20 #25
I'm sorry. ReRe Sep 20 #28
It's probable Steve Bannon and Stephen Miller AdamGG Sep 20 #43
How many letters do you think you'll need when they start ordering you to kill fellow Americans? Scalded Nun Sep 19 #14
6 year Navy vet here.. Permanut Sep 20 #24
Too bad , aviators or drone pilots.... Bread and Circuses Sep 19 #15
What else would one expect B.See Sep 19 #17
Sooner or later, Chump will tell them to drop a nuke FakeNoose Sep 19 #18
Honest question NJCher Sep 20 #27
Contact someone in congress. Be a whistleblower LeftInTX Sep 20 #30
UCMJ covers it. paleotn Sep 20 #32
And the people who have authority to enforce the law Kaleva Sep 20 #40
Now I am Codifer Sep 20 #41
It's not too late for a junta Queso Delicioso Sep 20 #33
Et tu Mblaze Sep 20 #37
Trump has and will continue to put people of conscience in difficult positions. surfered Sep 20 #38
I haven't heard any news of them possibly being charged Kaleva Sep 20 #39
Maybe tsf will blow up Elon's mega-yacht for transporting Ketamine. rubbersole Sep 20 #44
Unfortunately WmChris Sep 20 #45
How many has he ordered blown up? Three? Katinfl Sep 20 #46
Commanders don't have the authority to absolve their personnel of wrongdoing LogDog75 Sep 20 #47
think I read this on bluesky vapor2 Sep 20 #51
In the military, it all rolls downhill dlk Sep 20 #52
This wouldn't surprise me a bit Warpy Sep 20 #53
The majority of the military voted for fascism, leaders are hand picked tRump rump kissers, crimes against humanity will ImNotGod Sep 20 #54

Klarkashton

(4,091 posts)
1. It was an illegal order and the rank and file know it.
Fri Sep 19, 2025, 10:18 PM
Sep 19

They carried it out anyway. Fuck any of them that followed the order. That's not honor that's cowardice.

Liberal In Texas

(15,646 posts)
4. They have to stop worrying about getting some BS letters and start refusing to obey what they clearly know
Fri Sep 19, 2025, 10:23 PM
Sep 19

are illegal orders.

Klarkashton

(4,091 posts)
5. Don't hold your breath. These are between war military
Fri Sep 19, 2025, 10:25 PM
Sep 19

People that volunteered. They have no loyalty except to themselves. Sorry to have to say this

Attilatheblond

(7,336 posts)
48. And now we know why the JAG Corp was decimated. No one left to go to for help when given illegal orders?
Sat Sep 20, 2025, 06:00 PM
Sep 20

Oldvet

(88 posts)
49. This
Sat Sep 20, 2025, 06:32 PM
Sep 20

I'm not sure if what they did was legal or not, but getting a letter from a CO if you knowingly followed an illegal order is laughable.

RockRaven

(18,076 posts)
6. Being told "no, it really is okay to follow these orders" doesn't absolve one from
Fri Sep 19, 2025, 10:27 PM
Sep 19

responsibility on the grounds that one was "just following orders." That phrase is a trope for a reason. Any such letter wouldn't be worth a damn when the chips are down. But the chips won't ever be down.

What IS going to protect all those military personnel is the simple fact that the US will never hold anyone accountable for those murders, nor allow any international entity do so without using every tool available to counter them. It doesn't matter which party controls what part of the government, the non-consequences are consistent.

Klarkashton

(4,091 posts)
8. No way is maga congress going to do an investigation .
Fri Sep 19, 2025, 10:33 PM
Sep 19

They already murdered people in a boat in NK. Nothing was said.

markodochartaigh

(4,162 posts)
19. Yes, look at William Callie,
Sat Sep 20, 2025, 12:07 AM
Sep 20

William Laws Calley Jr. (June 8, 1943 – April 28, 2024) was a United States Army officer convicted by court-martial of the murder of 22 unarmed South Vietnamese civilians in the My Lai massacre on March 16, 1968, during the Vietnam War. Calley was released to house arrest under orders by President Richard Nixon three days after his conviction. The United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia granted him a new trial, but that ruling was overturned by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. His initial life sentence having been modified to a term of 20 years and then further reduced to ten, Calley ultimately served three years of house arrest for the murders.
Or Jacob Smith:
"'I want no prisoners. I wish you to kill and burn, the more you kill and burn the better it will please me. I want all persons killed who are capable of bearing arms in actual hostilities against the United States,' General Jacob H. Smith said.

Since it was a popular belief among the Americans serving in the Philippines that native males were born with bolos in their hands, Major Littleton "Tony" Waller asked, "I would like to know the limit of age to respect, sir."

"Ten years", Smith said.

"Persons of ten years and older are those designated as being capable of bearing arms?"

"Yes." Smith confirmed his instructions a second time."
In May 1902, Smith faced a court-martial for his orders, being tried not for murder or other war crimes, but for "conduct to the prejudice of good order and military discipline". The court-martial found Smith guilty and sentenced him "to be admonished by the reviewing authority."[31]

To ease the subsequent public outcry in America, Secretary of War Elihu Root recommended that Smith be retired. President Roosevelt accepted this recommendation, and ordered Smith's retirement from the Army, with no additional punishment.

AverageOldGuy

(3,000 posts)
9. This is not rumor
Fri Sep 19, 2025, 11:08 PM
Sep 19

Guy I served with in Vietnam has a son who is a very senior (name of military service omitted) officer with several stars. He tells me that his son and "a lot" of colonels/captains, 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-stars are NOT HAPPY about a these killings and a LOT more of the Trump-Hegseth bullshit. They universally have no respect for Hegseth and consider the "Dept of War" to be a bad, stupid, not funny joke.

Will there be a "night of the long knives" in reverse in the US? Probably not, but we have never before lived in times like these.

usonian

(20,874 posts)
26. He is ramping up his brinksmanship. There will be a breaking point.
Sat Sep 20, 2025, 02:51 AM
Sep 20

And he wants it to take complete control, which pays his debt to Putin.

But, having served, I understand the oath. He does not understand honor and courage. Not one bit.

There will be a "Petrov" moment.

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220295160 may 2025

paleotn

(20,947 posts)
34. Can you imagine, after all you've gone through to achieve flag rank.
Sat Sep 20, 2025, 09:20 AM
Sep 20

Stars on your shoulder boards. The long hard slog. The work, the politics, the deployments, uprooting your family every couple of years. And then, after all you've achieved, being subordinate to a 2nd rate, weekend talking head from Fux News. The guy didn't even rate weekdays much less prime time on the lying network. He spent a few Nat. Guard years far, far in the rear with the gear. And I
have to obey this grossly unqualified, moronic mother fucker?!! Oh, hell no!!!

It's and unimaginable insult.

Jarqui

(10,765 posts)
10. In Nuremberg, Nazis who claimed they were just following orders
Fri Sep 19, 2025, 11:14 PM
Sep 19

got their punishment reduced. It did no exonerate them.

canetoad

(19,527 posts)
29. Nope
Sat Sep 20, 2025, 03:24 AM
Sep 20
In 1945–46, during the Nuremberg trials the issue of superior orders again arose. Before the end of World War II, the Allies suspected such a defense might be employed and issued the London Charter of the International Military Tribunal (IMT), which explicitly stated that following an unlawful order is not a valid defense against charges of war crimes.

Thus, under Nuremberg Principle IV, "defense of superior orders" is not a defense for war crimes, although it might be a mitigating factor that could influence a sentencing authority to lessen the penalty. Nuremberg Principle IV states:

The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superior_orders


This was claimed by numerous Nuremberg defendants, Hoess, Eichmann and others. They were all executed.

Jarqui

(10,765 posts)
31. Maybe I did not express myself well
Sat Sep 20, 2025, 04:08 AM
Sep 20

"Following orders" could be considered a mitigating factor. Consideration of mitigating factors is common for sentencing criminals.

For example: If the soldier was going to get shot in the back for not following orders to commit a (war) crime, then that would be regarded as a mitigating factor to reduce the sentence. It did not exonerate them of the (war) crime but those mitigating circumstances would reduce the sentence vs those who did not have mitigating circumstances and committed the same (war) crime. I think most people get that. That reasoning got applied at Nuremberg.

For "Hoess & Eichmann" "following orders" would probably fail because they could have gotten away or done something else to reduce the carnage but they did not.

Those following Trump's orders to kill those on boats from Venezuela probably would wind up closer to "Hoess & Eichmann" in terms of guilt of the crime though many people seem to fear Trump and they may have some sort of mens rea argument - brainwashed into believing in Trump.

AdamGG

(1,794 posts)
42. It doesn't matter - we first need to get to the point where
Sat Sep 20, 2025, 01:27 PM
Sep 20

they're being judged by a post-Trump non-MAGA tribunal. And, even if we're fortunate enough to get there, there will still be the same rigged kangaroo Supreme Court.

ReRe

(12,036 posts)
23. Holy moley Mother of God.
Sat Sep 20, 2025, 01:34 AM
Sep 20
We're going to get it, aren't we? This kind of National Security is like no security at all.

PufPuf23

(9,603 posts)
12. Trump is incubating counter and surprise strikes all 4 corners of the Earth
Fri Sep 19, 2025, 11:32 PM
Sep 19

I am convinced Trump wants wars. Too many live for the opportunity thinking the USA is invincible.

ReRe

(12,036 posts)
22. No.
Sat Sep 20, 2025, 01:21 AM
Sep 20

I think what is in dumbass's mind is that titillating amendment in the Ukrainian Constitution about no elections during wartime. He thinks he can just sign that amendment into law here in the US with an EO. He looks at EOs as edicts. Anyway, he thinks he can sign that into law after he gets us in a war. All this to thwart the 2026 midterm elections.

PufPuf23

(9,603 posts)
25. Not sure what you mean by "No".
Sat Sep 20, 2025, 02:32 AM
Sep 20

My post is aligned with what you project just not as detailed.

What is bad is that Trump is the face of a movement that will cut him to the quick when he is no longer useful, while clever he is also dense. He is emulating and competing with Putin and Netanyahu. Troubling.

ReRe

(12,036 posts)
28. I'm sorry.
Sat Sep 20, 2025, 03:00 AM
Sep 20

I think I was just disagreeing with why he is so anxious to get us into a war.

AdamGG

(1,794 posts)
43. It's probable Steve Bannon and Stephen Miller
Sat Sep 20, 2025, 01:32 PM
Sep 20

"Flooding the zone with shit" with illegal authoritarian actions on every conceivable front. There's so many of them that it's harder for people to single out individual ones and it also may be intended to make people more intimidated and capitulate more easily.

Scalded Nun

(1,514 posts)
14. How many letters do you think you'll need when they start ordering you to kill fellow Americans?
Fri Sep 19, 2025, 11:39 PM
Sep 19

A letter to stay out of jail?
A letter to help you sleep at night?
A letter so you can look in the mirror?
A letter for when you salute the flag?
A letter so you can answer your kids when they ask 'What did you do in the war, Daddy/Mommy?"

I did almost 21 years in the military and these cowards make me sick...and the worst are the senior leaders.

Permanut

(7,574 posts)
24. 6 year Navy vet here..
Sat Sep 20, 2025, 01:36 AM
Sep 20

Well said, and I'm still wondering even ONE miltary/vet supports Cadet Bonespurs.

Bread and Circuses

(1,188 posts)
15. Too bad , aviators or drone pilots....
Fri Sep 19, 2025, 11:47 PM
Sep 19

We’re coming for you as well as everyone in your command structure for crimes against humanity.

You dishonored your oath and country and asked for a letter?

Get used to living in a 6 foot cell.

B.See

(6,780 posts)
17. What else would one expect
Fri Sep 19, 2025, 11:49 PM
Sep 19

when a criminal and psychopath is given complete authority to do whatever the fuck he wants?

Only, the blood (and CULPABILITY) is not only upon his hands, but also the hands of all who empower him.

NJCher

(41,540 posts)
27. Honest question
Sat Sep 20, 2025, 02:55 AM
Sep 20

To anyone who has been in the U.S. military:

How would a person refuse?

Can you just resign?

What would be the procedure when given these orders?

paleotn

(20,947 posts)
32. UCMJ covers it.
Sat Sep 20, 2025, 09:08 AM
Sep 20

Uniform Code of Military Justice. The rules when you're in uniform. The key words are manifestly unlawful orders. Anyone would ordinarily know it's unlawful. Sounds simple but it's not. Situations are usually complicated. And this regime skirts just beyond the law. Whether it's unlawful or not is up to a court martial to decide. Unless it's really clear cut, there's risk involved to the service member disobeying.

Kaleva

(39,967 posts)
40. And the people who have authority to enforce the law
Sat Sep 20, 2025, 12:16 PM
Sep 20

are the ones who gave the orders in the first place.

Codifer

(1,091 posts)
41. Now I am
Sat Sep 20, 2025, 12:21 PM
Sep 20

trying to remember if "lawful orders" were described/defined in the "Bluejacket's Manual". I should think that they were.

surfered

(9,428 posts)
38. Trump has and will continue to put people of conscience in difficult positions.
Sat Sep 20, 2025, 11:53 AM
Sep 20

He’s the criminal along with Hegseth who fired a bunch of the guys who give commanders guidance on what is legal and what is not.

Kaleva

(39,967 posts)
39. I haven't heard any news of them possibly being charged
Sat Sep 20, 2025, 12:08 PM
Sep 20

The ones that could charge them are the ones that gave the orders..

WmChris

(406 posts)
45. Unfortunately
Sat Sep 20, 2025, 04:03 PM
Sep 20

There are legions of bad actors ready and willing to fill the gap. Most of more evil, cunning, and smarter.

LogDog75

(882 posts)
47. Commanders don't have the authority to absolve their personnel of wrongdoing
Sat Sep 20, 2025, 05:13 PM
Sep 20

As a 28-year AF veteran, I'm familiar with the military chain of command and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Commanders are limited on the legal actions they can take on their personnel. They do not have the authority to absolve anyone before or after and action has taken place. If military personnel carry out an order, regardless of being a legal or illegal order, the person issuing the order and the person(s) following the order are held responsible for their action.

It is not up to the commander to decide on whether the order is illegal but up to the military justice system. Prior to indicting anyone, an Article 32 investigation is held to determine if there sufficient evidence to charge an individual or individuals. If charges are recommended, then the person(s) involved will face a court martial. A military court martial is not a slam dunk for the prosecution. The prosecution has to prove the charges against the individual(s) to a court martial panel (jury) just like a district attorney has to prove the charges against a defendant in a civilian trial. If the individual(s) is found guilty, the case is automatically appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces.

In short, the commander cannot absolve anyone of obey an illegal order.

Warpy

(113,955 posts)
53. This wouldn't surprise me a bit
Sat Sep 20, 2025, 09:24 PM
Sep 20

because although it looks like all 3 boats hit have been up to no good, a mistake is going to happen sooner or later and it is going to be a bad one when it does.

Right now they look like the kuid of boats that take shit from the shore out to freighters or fishing boats for distribution worldwide, which means most likely coke.

But that's not what this is about, protecting the world from the demon cocaine. It's about removing a source of revenue from Maduro in an attempt to keep him from getting even more tucked up in bed with China.

Good luck with that.

ImNotGod

(1,146 posts)
54. The majority of the military voted for fascism, leaders are hand picked tRump rump kissers, crimes against humanity will
Sat Sep 20, 2025, 09:44 PM
Sep 20

be the theme of the new nazi regime.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rumor heard from an old f...