Trump abusing the law to apply pressure on his opponents. No surprise they’re getting sloppy.

Sounds like maybe the faux-king idiot insisted on writing or editing the complaint himself, though.

Judge just told Trump "I ain't reading all that shit, go try again."😀😂😀

That was a ridiculous lawsuit.

"Wah! The New York Times supported Kamala Harris and not ME! SUE! SUE!"

https://russblib.blogspot.com

This section is hilarious.

fact, I'll bet Lawrence O'Donnell has already phoned the judge. Sadly, poor Donald won't comprehend much of the ruling. Too many big words.

the pleader states, “‘The Apprentice’ represented the cultural magnitude of President Trump’s singular bril-
liance, which captured the [Z]eitgeist of our time.”

Repetitive, laudatory but superfluous

Thanks for posting this, Ocelot II!

Are you kidding us? We're not going to read this shit.
GTFOH

should have been concise and to the point of why/how he's been harmed by the NY Times.

Believe he has an uphill slog because djt's lawyers need to show that the newspaper printed the story with intentional malice. That's the same problem that exists with djt's lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal regarding the Epstein birthday card.

Large newspapers keep excellent attorneys on retainer just for these occasions.

it was all like: "ME, ME, ME!!! I'm the greatest human being alive. HOW DARE THEY FUCKING CRITICIZE ME!!!"

place. He'll probably submit something else, unfortunately.

then I went to the link up thread in Ocelot 's post and it looked intimidating. But I started to read and it's pretty funny. it's the Judges decision.

only bits and pieces of the actual appeal are quoted and summarized, but you get the general idea.

He's a flaming idiot!! obviously he wrote much of the appeal.

The neighborhood crank who files endless lawsuits against the neighborhood association or the proverbial inmate who files 400 suits a year. To see it applied against the President of the United States is truly remarkable.

Like it or not, he has been successful, or has gotten the other side to settle, several of the suits he has filed.

It is a very high bar for someone to be barred from access to the courts.

Who is the lucky duck that has to explain "vituperation" and "invective" to Trump?

Now Trump can blame the judge for throwing out his case and he doesn’t have to do discovery!

All theater!

What the court did, sua sponte, was strike the complaint with leave to amend within 28 days to bring it into compliance with the pleading requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8.

Barratry is the criminal offense of habitually bringing about quarrels or lawsuits, especially for profit or harassment.  Lock him up!

Moreover, his litigation history, at least from 1980 to the mid 20-teens reveals that he has been a defendant almost as much as a plaintiff and of the suits where he was a plaintiff, almost 80 percent involved his casino business.

Sadly, his cases aren't thrown out of court as often as they probably should be -- the folks he sues all too often capitulate and settle.