Battles
Get Ur Rest
Look for Joy
We have
A Big Fight
Ahead
have time to
to send some
money DU`s
way. Support
the summer
fund drive!
I have
DU friends
everywhere.
Rebellions
are built
on HOPE
DU
keeps
HOPE
alive
Thank you
EarlG
all the stickies
on Grovelbot's
Big Board!
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsProtests as newborn removed from Greenlandic mother after 'parenting competence' tests
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/aug/23/protests-as-newborn-removed-from-greenlandic-mother-after-parenting-competence-testsProtests as newborn removed from Greenlandic mother after parenting competence tests
Danish authorities take one-hour-old infant despite law banning the tests on people with Greenlandic backgrounds
Miranda Bryant Nordic correspondent
Sat 23 Aug 2025 07.00 EDT
A Greenlandic mothers one-hour-old baby was removed from her by Danish authorities after she underwent parenting competence tests despite a new law banning the use of the controversial psychometric assessments on people with Greenlandic backgrounds.
Ivana Nikoline Brønlund, who was born in Nuuk to Greenlandic parents and has played for the Greenlandic handball team, gave birth to her daughter, Aviaja-Luuna, on 11 August in a hospital in Hvidovre, near Copenhagen, where she lives with her family.
An hour later, the local municipality took the infant into foster care. Brønlund, 18, says she has since only seen her daughter once, for an hour, when she was not allowed to comfort the baby or change her nappy.
The parenting competence tests, known as FKU (forældrekompetenceundersøgelse), were banned on people with Greenlandic backgrounds earlier this year after years of criticism by campaigners and human rights bodies, who argued successfully that the tests were racist because they were culturally unsuitable for people from Inuit backgrounds. As the law came into force in May, campaigners are asking why Brønlund was still subjected to a test.
more still not white enough

rampartd
(2,355 posts)we must save the greenland babies .......
Jersey Devil
(10,459 posts)Trump will be on the first landing boat leading our troops to victory.
Irish_Dem
(73,311 posts)In fact in some countries this practice would be illegal as well as unethical.
You cannot invent a test and norm it on one group and then use it on another totally
different group.
This woman should sue the hell out of the Danish govt and there would be many
American psychologists who would testify on her behalf.
Bev54
(12,769 posts)from an American psychologist? Seriously they have excellent psychologists in Denmark and Europe. The idea of American exceptionalism is still alive and well.
flashman13
(1,482 posts)Blue Dotty
(148 posts)After reading this, my mind automatically filled in the blanks for FKU. I am betting I am not alone here.
Bev54
(12,769 posts)Response to Bev54 (Reply #4)
Mosby This message was self-deleted by its author.
Irish_Dem
(73,311 posts)excluded from the legitimate science and psychometric community.
They are committing illegal and unethical acts.
ETA: Insulting American psychologists who follow the law and ethics as your defense
is a very weak argument. Which further proves my point. When the lack of science and law
cannot be defended, insulting others seems to be the course of action.
It is particularly heinous to use an unethical testing procedure to separate a mother
from her newborn infant. Thereby disrupting critical bonding experiences and breast feeding
which may have serious negative lifelong consequences.
There must be data and facts apart from this inappropriate testing procedure to warrant
such a serious legal and clinical decision.