Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Celerity

(52,167 posts)
Thu Jul 31, 2025, 10:52 AM Jul 31

EU further abandons its Green Deal with pledge to buy US energy



As part of the trade agreement between the European Union and the US, Europe committed to making strategic purchases across the Atlantic worth $750 billion (about €650 billion), covering fuels.

https://www.lemonde.fr/en/economy/article/2025/07/31/customs-duties-the-eu-further-abandons-its-green-deal-with-pledge-to-buy-us-energy_6743928_19.html

https://archive.ph/Q1Tn8



The agreement unveiled on Sunday, July 27, between Donald Trump's United States and Ursula von der Leyen's European Commission goes beyond the matter of customs barriers – in this case, 15% on imports of European products, starting Friday, August 1. The Commission pledged that the member states of the European Union (EU) would significantly increase their energy supplies from the US over the next three years. The official pledge is to bring the total value of European purchases to $750 billion (€650 billion) over three years by sourcing American oil, liquefied natural gas (LNG) or nuclear fuel – an average of $250 billion per year.

Pending further details, this figure raises questions. According to the online news outlet Contexte, it could represent the sum of investments already planned by European companies. Legally, "the EU cannot compel companies" to make this or that purchase, emphasized Phuc-Vinh Nguyen, head of the energy center at Institut Jacques-Delors, a French think tank. In 2019, China had already promised Trump to increase its energy purchases, but ultimately did not reach the pledged levels.

'Easier said than done'

On Tuesday, July 29, the European Commission said the $750 billion figure "will replace Russian gas and oil" still circulating in the EU. Since 2022 and the start of the war in Ukraine, it has set a goal of ending Russian hydrocarbon imports by 2027. On Monday, July 28, the White House made no secret of its satisfaction, stating that the agreement "will strengthen the United States' energy dominance." Yet the European promise appeared difficult to achieve. To fulfill it, EU countries would have to triple the amount of their transatlantic purchases.

In 2024, across all sources, EU countries spent nearly €376 billion on energy imports, according to Eurostat, the EU's statistics agency. This included about €65 billion in deliveries from the US, according to estimates from the Wall Street Journal. The US has already become the leading exporter of liquefied natural gas to EU countries (accounting for 45% in 2024), and also of oil (16%). "On the demand side, further increasing the US share in the EU's energy imports is easier said than done," said Simone Tagliapietra, a researcher at the Bruegel Institute, a Brussels-based economic think tank. This is especially true as many European firms have already signed long-term contracts with other suppliers.

A 'radical shift'......................
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Melon

(797 posts)
2. I don't see this as going anything against the green deal.
Thu Jul 31, 2025, 10:58 AM
Jul 31

This is replacing energy purchases that are largely coming from Russia. Countries like Germany are still well down the green energy road, but they don’t have the infrastructure to store enough energy during peaks to cover everything. They need a safety net of energy that includes gas and nuclear.

Celerity

(52,167 posts)
3. Lucie Pinson, director of the NGO Reclaim Finance, also saw in this "a disastrous signal" in terms of the fight against
Thu Jul 31, 2025, 11:05 AM
Jul 31

climate change. At a time when gas consumption is declining across Europe, the Commission is still betting hundreds of billions of euros on the importation of fossil fuels such as gas and oil. This marks a "dramatic U-turn" from the 2019 European Green Deal, according to Esther Bollendorff, spokesperson for Climate Action Network (CAN) Europe.

Melon

(797 posts)
4. They are already importing that NG now.
Thu Jul 31, 2025, 11:09 AM
Jul 31

It’s supporting the war against themselves by Russia. It’s the craziest thing. EU is anti Russia, but is the big buyer and financer of the machine.

Celerity

(52,167 posts)
5. We (I live in the EU) need to greatly reduce fossil fuel consumption (as do all nations), not just switch our suppliers.
Thu Jul 31, 2025, 11:15 AM
Jul 31

The deal with the US is not at all conducive to a reduction in fossil fuel use here.

NickB79

(20,113 posts)
6. They aren't going to buy $750 billion in oil and gas
Thu Jul 31, 2025, 08:26 PM
Jul 31

It's been dissected here:

https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/eus-pledge-250-billion-us-energy-imports-is-delusional-2025-07-28/

The United States exported 1.45 billion barrels of crude in 2024, according to Kpler, which would be worth $101.5 billion at a price of $70 a barrel.
U.S. shipments of LNG were 87.05 million tons in 2024, which would be worth about $54 billion at an average price of $12 per mmBtu.
The U.S. exported 51.53 million tons of metallurgical coal in 2024, worth $10.3 billion at an average price of $200 a ton.
Putting together the value of all three energy commodities gives a total of $165.8 billion, meaning that even if the EU bought the entire volume it would still fall well short of the $250 billion.


Basically, they lied to Trump and he believed it.

Melon

(797 posts)
7. Natural Gas and coal and are not at export capacity for the US
Thu Jul 31, 2025, 11:52 PM
Jul 31

We are advantaged globally on NG because we have surplus capacity here. The new LNG terminals are not at capacity. I would imagine coal capacity could also be greatly increased since mines were shutdown in the last years.

thought crime

(812 posts)
8. The trade agreement with the EU is a bad deal.
Fri Aug 1, 2025, 12:02 AM
Aug 1

What the US needs is massive investment to spur it's own Green New Deal. Trump's obstruction of the transition to renewable/zero carbon energy is his greatest crime.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»EU further abandons its G...