General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEU further abandons its Green Deal with pledge to buy US energy

As part of the trade agreement between the European Union and the US, Europe committed to making strategic purchases across the Atlantic worth $750 billion (about 650 billion), covering fuels.
https://www.lemonde.fr/en/economy/article/2025/07/31/customs-duties-the-eu-further-abandons-its-green-deal-with-pledge-to-buy-us-energy_6743928_19.html
https://archive.ph/Q1Tn8

The agreement unveiled on Sunday, July 27, between Donald Trump's United States and Ursula von der Leyen's European Commission goes beyond the matter of customs barriers in this case, 15% on imports of European products, starting Friday, August 1. The Commission pledged that the member states of the European Union (EU) would significantly increase their energy supplies from the US over the next three years. The official pledge is to bring the total value of European purchases to $750 billion (650 billion) over three years by sourcing American oil, liquefied natural gas (LNG) or nuclear fuel an average of $250 billion per year.
Pending further details, this figure raises questions. According to the online news outlet Contexte, it could represent the sum of investments already planned by European companies. Legally, "the EU cannot compel companies" to make this or that purchase, emphasized Phuc-Vinh Nguyen, head of the energy center at Institut Jacques-Delors, a French think tank. In 2019, China had already promised Trump to increase its energy purchases, but ultimately did not reach the pledged levels.
'Easier said than done'
On Tuesday, July 29, the European Commission said the $750 billion figure "will replace Russian gas and oil" still circulating in the EU. Since 2022 and the start of the war in Ukraine, it has set a goal of ending Russian hydrocarbon imports by 2027. On Monday, July 28, the White House made no secret of its satisfaction, stating that the agreement "will strengthen the United States' energy dominance." Yet the European promise appeared difficult to achieve. To fulfill it, EU countries would have to triple the amount of their transatlantic purchases.
In 2024, across all sources, EU countries spent nearly 376 billion on energy imports, according to Eurostat, the EU's statistics agency. This included about 65 billion in deliveries from the US, according to estimates from the Wall Street Journal. The US has already become the leading exporter of liquefied natural gas to EU countries (accounting for 45% in 2024), and also of oil (16%). "On the demand side, further increasing the US share in the EU's energy imports is easier said than done," said Simone Tagliapietra, a researcher at the Bruegel Institute, a Brussels-based economic think tank. This is especially true as many European firms have already signed long-term contracts with other suppliers.
A 'radical shift'......................

OrlandoDem2
(3,110 posts)Melon
(797 posts)This is replacing energy purchases that are largely coming from Russia. Countries like Germany are still well down the green energy road, but they dont have the infrastructure to store enough energy during peaks to cover everything. They need a safety net of energy that includes gas and nuclear.
Celerity
(52,167 posts)climate change. At a time when gas consumption is declining across Europe, the Commission is still betting hundreds of billions of euros on the importation of fossil fuels such as gas and oil. This marks a "dramatic U-turn" from the 2019 European Green Deal, according to Esther Bollendorff, spokesperson for Climate Action Network (CAN) Europe.
Melon
(797 posts)Its supporting the war against themselves by Russia. Its the craziest thing. EU is anti Russia, but is the big buyer and financer of the machine.
Celerity
(52,167 posts)The deal with the US is not at all conducive to a reduction in fossil fuel use here.
NickB79
(20,113 posts)It's been dissected here:
https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/eus-pledge-250-billion-us-energy-imports-is-delusional-2025-07-28/
U.S. shipments of LNG were 87.05 million tons in 2024, which would be worth about $54 billion at an average price of $12 per mmBtu.
The U.S. exported 51.53 million tons of metallurgical coal in 2024, worth $10.3 billion at an average price of $200 a ton.
Putting together the value of all three energy commodities gives a total of $165.8 billion, meaning that even if the EU bought the entire volume it would still fall well short of the $250 billion.
Basically, they lied to Trump and he believed it.
Melon
(797 posts)We are advantaged globally on NG because we have surplus capacity here. The new LNG terminals are not at capacity. I would imagine coal capacity could also be greatly increased since mines were shutdown in the last years.
thought crime
(812 posts)What the US needs is massive investment to spur it's own Green New Deal. Trump's obstruction of the transition to renewable/zero carbon energy is his greatest crime.