Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

justaprogressive

(3,893 posts)
Fri May 30, 2025, 10:44 AM Friday

Why Are Republicans Planning to Tax University Endowments More Heavily Than Other Forms of Private Wealth?



The Republicans behind Trump’s “one big beautiful bill” have propagated a grossly misleading perception of the legislation’s sharply increased tax on university endowments. Rep. Jason Smith (R-MO), chair of the House Ways and Means Committee, says that the bill “subject[s] the largest endowments to the corporate tax rate.” True, at 21 percent, the top rates on corporations and university endowments would be nominally the same, but that is a false equivalence, as corporations have access to deductions that university endowments don’t.

Corporations don’t pay an effective rate of 21 percent; they pay considerably less. According to a report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office, after the 2017 Trump tax legislation cut the top nominal rate on corporate income from 35 percent to 21 percent, the effective tax rate—the percentage of income companies paid after tax breaks—fell on average to 9 percent in 2018. In contrast, the current House bill wouldn’t allow universities any significant breaks from the tax on endowment income.

The endowment tax rate in the House bill is graduated according to the size of a university’s endowment, relative to the number of U.S. students (foreign students don’t count). Universities with endowments per student of $2 million or more are subject to the 21 percent rate. (Full disclosure: I teach at one of those institutions, Princeton University.) The rate is 14 percent for endowments of $1.25 million to $2 million per student; 7 percent for endowments of $750,000 to $1.25 million per student; and 1.4 percent for endowments of $500,000 to $750,000 per student.

But even at the lower levels, the Trump endowment tax would still impose a higher effective tax on universities subject to the tax than on a business with the same overall income and expenses. To be equivalent to the corporate income tax, the tax on universities would have to be levied on their net income. Universities, however, typically have little or no net income, because they use the income from their endowment to make up for operating losses (including student aid) and to pay for capital investments (which this legislation wouldn’t allow them to depreciate).


https://prospect.org/education/2025-05-30-why-republicans-planning-to-tax-university-endowments/
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Are Republicans Planning to Tax University Endowments More Heavily Than Other Forms of Private Wealth? (Original Post) justaprogressive Friday OP
Simple... because they support education and Repukes want a dumbed down society. kysrsoze Friday #1
All of these assaults are assaults on education itself peggysue2 Friday #2
Donor rights?.billionaires create their own charitable foundations, no tax; but professionals donate... lostnfound Friday #3

kysrsoze

(6,322 posts)
1. Simple... because they support education and Repukes want a dumbed down society.
Fri May 30, 2025, 10:49 AM
Friday

I'm sure there's also the notion that this is some kind of wealth redistribution (that is only allowed when it is steered toward the wealthy) and affront to their libertarian mindset of never helping anyone but themselves.

peggysue2

(11,884 posts)
2. All of these assaults are assaults on education itself
Fri May 30, 2025, 11:02 AM
Friday

Higher education has been a Republican target for years with claims that universities and Marxist professors are poisoning the minds of their students. In reality? The right-wing wants to stop the instruction of critical-thinking, ideas outside their own ideology. Citizens who can think for themselves are a threat to ideological propaganda and control. An anti-intellectual movement has been afoot for decades. Education, art, culture. The far-right wants to shape, promote and control it all.

Much easier to control an uneducated, unenlightened population. Free-thinking is a no-no for authoritarian cults. Only Big Daddy has the answers, or:

Those that control the minds of the young control the future.

lostnfound

(17,000 posts)
3. Donor rights?.billionaires create their own charitable foundations, no tax; but professionals donate...
Fri May 30, 2025, 09:50 PM
Friday

Successful professionals donate to their Alma mater expecting it to go to a good cause.
If they can impose a 21% tax on college endowment income, then every billionaire’s pet charitable trust should also be taxable.

Not to mention the part about not wanting people to be educated and the other part about disempowering any opposition.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why Are Republicans Plann...