General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy Are Republicans Planning to Tax University Endowments More Heavily Than Other Forms of Private Wealth?

Corporations dont pay an effective rate of 21 percent; they pay considerably less. According to a report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office, after the 2017 Trump tax legislation cut the top nominal rate on corporate income from 35 percent to 21 percent, the effective tax ratethe percentage of income companies paid after tax breaksfell on average to 9 percent in 2018. In contrast, the current House bill wouldnt allow universities any significant breaks from the tax on endowment income.
The endowment tax rate in the House bill is graduated according to the size of a universitys endowment, relative to the number of U.S. students (foreign students dont count). Universities with endowments per student of $2 million or more are subject to the 21 percent rate. (Full disclosure: I teach at one of those institutions, Princeton University.) The rate is 14 percent for endowments of $1.25 million to $2 million per student; 7 percent for endowments of $750,000 to $1.25 million per student; and 1.4 percent for endowments of $500,000 to $750,000 per student.
But even at the lower levels, the Trump endowment tax would still impose a higher effective tax on universities subject to the tax than on a business with the same overall income and expenses. To be equivalent to the corporate income tax, the tax on universities would have to be levied on their net income. Universities, however, typically have little or no net income, because they use the income from their endowment to make up for operating losses (including student aid) and to pay for capital investments (which this legislation wouldnt allow them to depreciate).
https://prospect.org/education/2025-05-30-why-republicans-planning-to-tax-university-endowments/

kysrsoze
(6,322 posts)I'm sure there's also the notion that this is some kind of wealth redistribution (that is only allowed when it is steered toward the wealthy) and affront to their libertarian mindset of never helping anyone but themselves.
peggysue2
(11,884 posts)Higher education has been a Republican target for years with claims that universities and Marxist professors are poisoning the minds of their students. In reality? The right-wing wants to stop the instruction of critical-thinking, ideas outside their own ideology. Citizens who can think for themselves are a threat to ideological propaganda and control. An anti-intellectual movement has been afoot for decades. Education, art, culture. The far-right wants to shape, promote and control it all.
Much easier to control an uneducated, unenlightened population. Free-thinking is a no-no for authoritarian cults. Only Big Daddy has the answers, or:
Those that control the minds of the young control the future.
lostnfound
(17,000 posts)Successful professionals donate to their Alma mater expecting it to go to a good cause.
If they can impose a 21% tax on college endowment income, then every billionaires pet charitable trust should also be taxable.
Not to mention the part about not wanting people to be educated and the other part about disempowering any opposition.