Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge Howell has ruled for Perkins Coie, holding that Donald Trump's executive order targeting the firm was unconstituti (Original Post) LetMyPeopleVote 16 hrs ago OP
That's the Order. Here's the Memorandum - very long but quite juicy. Ocelot II 15 hrs ago #1
Thanks LetMyPeopleVote 15 hrs ago #2
Until the courts actually enforce the laws the rulings are meaningless. Blue Full Moon 15 hrs ago #3
This one's enforceable because it means Perkins Coie can ignore Trump's EO. Ocelot II 15 hrs ago #4
Here is a link to the 100+ page opinion LetMyPeopleVote 15 hrs ago #5
Great news malaise 15 hrs ago #6

Ocelot II

(124,499 posts)
1. That's the Order. Here's the Memorandum - very long but quite juicy.
Fri May 2, 2025, 06:54 PM
15 hrs ago
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.278290/gov.uscourts.dcd.278290.185.0.pdf

It starts out:

No American President has ever before issued executive orders like the one at issue in this lawsuit targeting a prominent law firm with adverse actions to be executed by all Executive branch agencies but, in purpose and effect, this action draws from a playbook as old as Shakespeare, who penned the phrase: “The first thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers.” WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE, HENRY VI, PART 2, act 4, sc. 2, l. 75. When Shakespeare’s character, a rebel leader intent on becoming king, see id. l. 74, hears this suggestion, he promptly incorporates this tactic as part of his plan to assume power, leading in the same scene to the rebel leader demanding “[a]way with him,” referring to an educated clerk, who “can make obligations and write court hand,” id. l. 90, 106. Eliminating lawyers as the guardians of the rule of law removes a major impediment to the path to more power. See Walters v. Nat’l Ass’n of Radiation Survivors, 473 U.S. 305, 371 n.24 (1985) (Stevens, J., dissenting) (explaining the import of the same Shakespearean statement to be “that disposing of lawyers is a step in the direction of a totalitarian form of government”).
....
The instant case presents an unprecedented attack on these foundational principles. On March 6, 2025, President Trump issued Executive Order 14230 (“EO 14230”), 90 Fed. Reg. 11781 (Mar. 11, 2025), entitled “Addressing Risks from Perkins Coie LLP.”2 By its terms, this Order stigmatizes and penalizes a particular law firm and its employees—from its partners to its associate attorneys, secretaries, and mailroom attendants—due to the Firm’s representation, both in the past and currently, of clients pursuing claims and taking positions with which the current President disagrees, as well as the Firm’s own speech. In a cringe-worthy twist on the theatrical phrase “Let’s kill all the lawyers,” EO 14230 takes the approach of “Let’s kill the lawyers I don’t like,” sending the clear message: lawyers must stick to the party line, or else.


And this isn't just a TRO; it's a permanent injunction. The Regime is likely to appeal, as they always do, but this is a real ass-kicking.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Judge Howell has ruled fo...