If you come back to life, you were never really killed. If Jesus doesn't come back to life, you don't have Christianity. A virgin birth at the start and resurrection at the end. The rest is just walking on water.

He was supposed to have suffered and died for our sins (I'm not sure how that really works, but that's what the doctrine says), and he was then resurrected (did God change his mind?).

That said, the bit about the Jews killing him is, of course, false; it was the Roman governor, Pontius Pilate, who was responsible; Jesus was executed for sedition against Rome. But if the GOPers are so concerned about anti-Semitism, why are they making an exception for the lie that the Jews killed Jesus, which is the very foundation of anti-Semitism, dating from the Middle Ages? Christians wouldn't have been hating and persecuting Jews since medieval times but for that very lie. If you sincerely want to do something about anti-Semitism in all forms you can't very well object to advocating support for Palestine and/or opposing Zionism on one hand (positions often espoused by leftish college students) while permitting others (some evangelical Christians) to preach the seminal lie that Jews killed Jesus. Seems pretty hypocritical to me.

That is all

To rationalize/justify that your own religion is the correct one, ya have to show that the other religion has major faults.

Eff them all

Since half of your excerpts have to do with the IHRA definition of antisemitism, specifically the number of supposedly controversial mentions of Israel in it, here are the pertinent mentions from the said definition:

I’m perfectly capable of defending myself. I just use the old Lenny Bruce line on them:

“Yeah, we killed Jesus……we killed him because he didn’t want to be a doctor.”