General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsChild damages $56M Rothko painting at Netherlands museum
April 28 (UPI) -- Dutch curators are considering "next steps" after a child damaged a $56 million painting by American artist Mark Rothko while visiting a museum in Rotterdam.
"The work by Rothko -- Grey, Orange on Maroon, No. 8 -- has suffered damage: a number of visible scratches in the unvarnished paint layer," a spokesperson at the Depot Boijmans Van Beuningen confirmed. "It happened because a child, in an unsupervised moment, touched the lower part of the work."
The painting from 1960 was being displayed at the museum's Depot as the main building undergoes renovations, which are expected to be completed in 2030.
(snip)
Restoration experts are currently working to determine the best course of action to repair the Rothko painting before it can be displayed again.
"We expect that the work will be able to be shown again in the future," the museum spokesperson told BBC. "Conservation expertise has been sought in the Netherlands and abroad. We are currently researching the next steps for the treatment of the painting."
Modern, unvarnished paintings are "particularly susceptible to damage," according to Sophie McAloone, conservation manager at the Fine Art Restoration Company.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/child-damages-56m-rothko-painting-232041257.html

marble falls
(65,039 posts)Mosby
(18,423 posts)Stupid.
EYESORE 9001
(28,172 posts)Advertising hotel-motel art shows? Some of the most gawdawful art - and all for retail prices too.
underpants
(190,261 posts)To me, art is something I cant do. I could do that Rothko. As was explained to me by art students I worked with but they thought of it. Okay.
EYESORE 9001
(28,172 posts)Theres artistic talent in my family, but I didnt inherit any. Guess when I was in queue to be reborn, I got in the wrong line and got fartistic ability instead.
BoRaGard
(5,217 posts)
Mosby
(18,423 posts)That might raise the value to $1000.
maxsolomon
(36,456 posts)They make you feel like they're vibrating from within. Doesn't really come across in a photo, but they're some of the most spiritual AbEx paintings I've ever seen.
Mosby
(18,423 posts)When I was in San Francisco a long time ago I went to the MOMA there. I was most impressed by the Klee exhibit. I love his work.
genxlib
(5,886 posts)It looks like some of his own work because it looks like a child painted it.
I will never understand the "value" of some modern art. I guess I am just a philistine.
Butterflylady
(4,385 posts)All they have to do is paint another one. How hard is it to copy?
JBTaurus83
(299 posts)I love going to the art museums here in Philly, but, I will never understand this crap.
Vinca
(51,991 posts)maxsolomon
(36,456 posts)Last edited Tue Apr 29, 2025, 06:34 PM - Edit history (1)
I don't understand why the compunction to reject post-WW2 Abstract Expressionism.
It's the art of our Grandparents. Rothko was born 2 years before my Grandfather, in 1903. This painting is 65 years old.
WhiskeyGrinder
(24,768 posts)canetoad
(18,965 posts)We have one painting in the State gallery - Untitled (Red) and I become almost hypnotised by it. This thread is full of phillistines
yardwork
(66,457 posts)FirstLight
(15,023 posts)Was it an American family...? lol
edit to add...
I see they aren't doxxing the parents/kid
It looks like a kid's painting, so maybe the kid was attracted to it ...
Seriously, some "art" is really stupid...
mopinko
(72,406 posts)if rothko laughed all the way to the bank. i DO appreciate his work, mostly. but i have no idea how some artists paint the same thing over, and over, and over.
maxsolomon
(36,456 posts)He killed himself.
mopinko
(72,406 posts)ive seen some incredibly damaged paintings restored. its not rocket science.
they dont even have to deal w 18th century pigments, etc. u can probably still buy his paints.
chowder66
(10,482 posts)His paintings have a lot to do with color balance and how colors can evoke moods. Many artists have been inspired by him.
This was explained to me by an art history teacher and an artist, separately. They went into more depth on him but that's all I can remember.
question everything
(50,154 posts)Mossfern
(3,745 posts)Your friend is correct.
My son texted to me a of Rothko drawing he liked the other day.
I can understand how people don't get his work.
chowder66
(10,482 posts)miyazaki
(2,437 posts)
jmowreader
(52,214 posts)Since this $56 million painting is three big solid-color rectangles, simply use a spectrophotometer to get you the exact color match of the area the kid screwed up, mix a little paint of the right shade, and spot-paint it.
Oh...and then put the thing behind UV-resistant glass so it doesn't happen again.
maxsolomon
(36,456 posts)Rzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz. Like a cat.
SWBTATTReg
(25,216 posts)of art left out in the 'open', subject to any kind of possible danger?
Doesn't the needs of the many (to view the item in the future millions of times, behind a protective barrier vs. an unprotected barrier) count for something?
maxsolomon
(36,456 posts)Very few are behind glass, and that's a good thing.
Docents do most of the shooing away. Some have pressure-sensitive plinths in front that go beep if you step on them.
WhiskeyGrinder
(24,768 posts)Do people have a right to view something as it exists in a certain context? A need?