Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

justaprogressive

(3,497 posts)
Tue Apr 29, 2025, 10:53 AM Tuesday

Private Equity's Do-or-Die Moment - The American Prospect

The year 1978 is not just noteworthy for the election of Pope John Paul II and National Lampoon’s Animal House. It was also the year that a little investment banking firm known as Kohlberg Kravis Roberts announced plans to take manufacturing conglomerate Houdaille Industries private through a leveraged deal, using the company’s assets and future cash flows as collateral to secure debt financing for the acquisition. Although KKR had completed three smaller deals the year before, its acquisition of Houdaille was the first leveraged buyout of a public company in modern history.

The successful deal set the stage for KKR’s rapid expansion into the 1980s and beyond. Today, KKR is a publicly traded investment firm with $638 billion in assets under management. Despite some initial skepticism, Wall Street would go on to follow in the firm’s footsteps. Such financial engineering has become a staple of the private equity industry.

Private equity firms pool investments from institutions like pensions and endowments into funds that buy a portfolio of companies through leveraged deals, where the bulk of the acquisition is financed through debt. To secure debt financing, the firm fronts a small amount of its own cash and raises additional capital from investors. It then leverages those assets to borrow the money it needs to complete the acquisition.

The typical holding period for a portfolio company is five to seven years. At the end of this period, the firm will either sell the company (ideally at a premium) or attempt to take it public. But countless companies have been crushed under the debt obligations they’ve been saddled with, from Toys “R” Us to Red Lobster. In these and many other cases, the private equity firms extracted hundreds of millions of dollars in fees and interest, while abandoning companies and their workers.


https://prospect.org/power/2025-04-29-private-equitys-do-or-die-moment/
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Private Equity's Do-or-Die Moment - The American Prospect (Original Post) justaprogressive Tuesday OP
GUESS WHO / what is taking over Social Security? Private equity. CousinIT Tuesday #1
I had the misfortune of once working for a company purchased by KKR EYESORE 9001 Tuesday #2
I'm rooting for private equity to fail EdmondDantes_ Tuesday #3
Almost every company ownership structure WSHazel Tuesday #5
The hostility to PE is misdirected WSHazel Tuesday #4

CousinIT

(11,295 posts)
1. GUESS WHO / what is taking over Social Security? Private equity.
Tue Apr 29, 2025, 11:01 AM
Tuesday

Frank Bisignano is from that world. You can surmise where it's going from there. It will be destroyed.

EYESORE 9001

(28,172 posts)
2. I had the misfortune of once working for a company purchased by KKR
Tue Apr 29, 2025, 11:05 AM
Tuesday

26 people in my division were summarily downsized - myself included. Seems the vulture capitalists bought a viable company, then rolled in a consortium of six companies totally unrelated to the core business. These companies were heavily debt-laden and dragged down my company like a stone.

EdmondDantes_

(437 posts)
3. I'm rooting for private equity to fail
Tue Apr 29, 2025, 11:07 AM
Tuesday

It's a short term gain, damn the long term consequences that is pushing money upwards away from the larger population.

WSHazel

(376 posts)
4. The hostility to PE is misdirected
Tue Apr 29, 2025, 11:17 AM
Tuesday

KKR and its peers have booted it many, many times over the years, but they also do a lot of good for America and its workers.

1) Generally, if PE is getting involved, the company is not operating at peak performance. Prior to PE, it was difficult for small or struggling companies to get capital which they desperately needed to invest back in the business through capex and marketing spend. Many if not most of the companies that PEs have bought over the years would have significantly underperformed what they did, or failed, without the capital infusion that PE brought. With so many PE backed businesses, there is a more vibrant job market because of so many well-capitalized businesses.

2) Most PE firms encourage employee equity ownership of their companies pretty far down the org chart, and KKR in particular is known for encouraging this kind of employee ownership. These equity stakes can pay for down payments of houses and kids' colleges when the companies achieve liquidity.

3) PE provides a critically important exit market for investment. Even family and individually owned businesses need a way out of their investment at some point, and PE is that way out. So an owner considering retooling a plant or developing a new product knows that they can recoup their investment at some point because there are so many PE firms that will be willing to buy them out in the future. This encourages business investment, which encourages job growth.

4) Small and mid-sized companies (the target market for PE firms) generate over 100% of all job growth, while large companies are generally net job losers.

PE professionals make a lot of money, so they do not deserve sympathy, but they are also personally investing meaningful dollars in every deal they do, so they are taking risk too. There are no bailouts when a PE firm blows it, and there are not huge government subsidies like there are in other industries like extraction and real estate.

PE's biggest problem going forward is higher interest rates. If interest rates stay near current levels over the next few years, and I expect they will, then PE firms will make a lot less money than they did in the 2010s. That is how the free market works.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Private Equity's Do-or-Di...