Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Seattle Times responds to rumors of the port being deserted. (Original Post) nolabear Apr 29 OP
Could you please describe what the link shows? RockCreek Apr 29 #1
+1. Yes? No? Maybe? Matter of opinion? stopdiggin Apr 29 #2
"If we don't get a resolution quickly, I think we're all going to feel a lot of pain in the pocketbook" dalton99a Apr 29 #4
Thank you! RockCreek Apr 29 #5
It tries to polish the turd a bit - but ultimately opines that the "future doesn't look good." harumph Apr 29 #3
Thank you! RockCreek Apr 29 #6

dalton99a

(88,704 posts)
4. "If we don't get a resolution quickly, I think we're all going to feel a lot of pain in the pocketbook"
Tue Apr 29, 2025, 08:36 AM
Apr 29

harumph

(2,744 posts)
3. It tries to polish the turd a bit - but ultimately opines that the "future doesn't look good."
Tue Apr 29, 2025, 08:32 AM
Apr 29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Seattle Times responds to...