Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CousinIT

(11,294 posts)
Mon Apr 28, 2025, 02:07 PM Monday

How Hitler Dismantled a Democracy in 53 Days: He used the constitution to shatter the constitution.

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2025/01/hitler-germany-constitution-authoritarianism/681233/

Archived: https://archive.ph/pJWTs

Bolded items are identical to what TRUMP said or did. . Trump is a fascist.

. . .

When he became chancellor himself, Hitler wanted to prevent others from doing unto him what he had done unto them. Though the vote share of his National Socialist party had been rising—in the election of September 1930, following the 1929 market crash, they had increased their representation in the Reichstag almost ninefold, from 12 delegates to 107, and in the July 1932 elections, they had more than doubled their mandate to 230 seats—they were still far from a majority. Their seats amounted to only 37 percent of the legislative body, and the larger right-wing coalition that the Nazi Party was a part of controlled barely 51 percent of the Reichstag, but Hitler believed that he should exercise absolute power: “37 percent represents 75 percent of 51 percent,” he argued to one American reporter, by which he meant that possessing the relative majority of a simple majority was enough to grant him absolute authority. But he knew that in a multiparty political system, with shifting coalitions, his political calculus was not so simple. He believed that an Ermächtigungsgesetz (“empowering law”) was crucial to his political survival. But passing such a law—which would dismantle the separation of powers, grant Hitler’s executive branch the authority to make laws without parliamentary approval, and allow Hitler to rule by decree, bypassing democratic institutions and the constitution—required the support of a two-thirds majority in the fractious Reichstag.

The process proved to be even more challenging than anticipated. Hitler found his dictatorial intentions getting thwarted within his first six hours as chancellor. At 11:30 that Monday morning, he swore an oath to uphold the constitution, then went across the street to the Hotel Kaiserhof for lunch, then returned to the Reich Chancellery for a group photo of the “Hitler Cabinet,” which was followed by his first formal meeting with his nine ministers at precisely 5 o’clock.

Hitler opened the meeting by boasting that millions of Germans had welcomed his chancellorship with “jubilation,” then outlined his plans for expunging key government officials and filling their positions with loyalists. At this point he turned to his main agenda item: the empowering law that, he argued, would give him the time (four years, according to the stipulations laid out in the draft of the law) and the authority necessary to make good on his campaign promises to revive the economy, reduce unemployment, increase military spending, withdraw from international treaty obligations, purge the country of foreigners he claimed were “poisoning” the blood of the nation, and exact revenge on political opponents. “Heads will roll in the sand,” Hitler had vowed at one rally.

. . .

Hitler had campaigned on the promise of draining the “parliamentarian swamp”—den parlamentarischen Sumpf—only to find himself now foundering in a quagmire of partisan politics and banging up against constitutional guardrails. He responded as he invariably did when confronted with dissenting opinions or inconvenient truths: He ignored them and doubled down.

The next day, Hitler announced new Reichstag elections, to be held in early March, and issued a memorandum to his party leaders. “After a thirteen-year struggle the National Socialist movement has succeeded in breaking through into the government, but the struggle to win the German nation is only beginning,” Hitler proclaimed, and then added venomously: “The National Socialist party knows that the new government is not a National Socialist government, even though it is conscious that it bears the name of its leader, Adolf Hitler.” He was declaring war on his own government.

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Fiendish Thingy

(19,202 posts)
1. Well, he also had the "Enabling Act"
Mon Apr 28, 2025, 02:09 PM
Monday

And the complicity of the military, both of which were essential to his successful dismantling of Germany’s so-called “democracy”.

lame54

(37,893 posts)
3. He started with a shit economy...
Mon Apr 28, 2025, 02:17 PM
Monday

And people were open for change

Although many were convinced that Biden's economy was shit they are starting to wake up to what a shit economy really is. Trump's economy

sop

(13,952 posts)
4. "The big joke on democracy is that it gives its mortal enemies the means to its own destruction." - Goebbels
Mon Apr 28, 2025, 02:22 PM
Monday

UTUSN

(74,024 posts)
5. K&R - and it's sick of the never-say-HITLER crowd to skip past the early signs that later add up to the extreme worst.
Mon Apr 28, 2025, 02:44 PM
Monday

Kaleva

(39,288 posts)
6. It was Hindenburg who signed into law The Enabling Act
Mon Apr 28, 2025, 02:52 PM
Monday

Prior to that, Hindenburg issued the Reichstag Fire Decree. Hitler , as Chancellor, didn’t have the authority to do either.

MineralMan

(148,975 posts)
7. And even more importantly, people just let him do it.
Mon Apr 28, 2025, 03:10 PM
Monday

That's the key thing, really. They let him do it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How Hitler Dismantled a D...