Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Snark Twain

(96 posts)
Sat Apr 26, 2025, 03:34 PM Apr 26

Faster cheaper alternative to the Panama Canal?

While Trump is blubbering about taking over the Panama Canal, Mexico has been making plans for a cheaper and faster alternative, that reduces dependency on the Panama Canal for inter oceanic transport - and yes China is investing heavily

?si=mkzoOgPfwFRo8S6y
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Faster cheaper alternative to the Panama Canal? (Original Post) Snark Twain Apr 26 OP
That looks to be about True Dough Apr 26 #1
Panama Canal has a ton of problems Snark Twain Apr 26 #3
It's a case of True Dough Apr 26 #5
This message was self-deleted by its author Celerity Apr 26 #2
Drump to buy dry canal? bucolic_frolic Apr 26 #4
It's a rail line, not a canal NickB79 Apr 26 #6
China's transport railway goes 215 mph Snark Twain Apr 26 #7

True Dough

(22,860 posts)
1. That looks to be about
Sat Apr 26, 2025, 03:36 PM
Apr 26

10 times the length of the Panama Canal. Many more complications there, I would anticipate.

Snark Twain

(96 posts)
3. Panama Canal has a ton of problems
Sat Apr 26, 2025, 03:44 PM
Apr 26

Including historic drought and low tides likely brought on global warming - this led to ships back logged and being on the waiting list to cross as long as 2 weeks and apparently they don’t see a short term fix

While Mexico’s approach will surely face some growing pains once the rail infrastructure is completed, it would be much faster and cheaper (according to the planners)

Response to Snark Twain (Original post)

NickB79

(19,885 posts)
6. It's a rail line, not a canal
Sat Apr 26, 2025, 06:12 PM
Apr 26

So you have to unload ships on one side, rail line it, and reload other ships on the other side. I struggle to see how it's faster or cheaper.

Snark Twain

(96 posts)
7. China's transport railway goes 215 mph
Sat Apr 26, 2025, 08:10 PM
Apr 26

so potentially China's investment might come in the form of this high speed railway and it can traverse that line in < 1 hour while a ship crosses the panama canal between 8-10 hours assumnig they get the green light to start the traverse (as previously noted waiting times can be as long as 2 weeks)

so it boils down t speed of offloading/loading the cargo onto railways - china has this expertise as well

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Faster cheaper alternativ...