Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

WhiskeyGrinder

(24,768 posts)
Fri Apr 25, 2025, 08:06 AM Apr 25

Training for NYPD Officers Categorized the Keffiyeh and Watermelon as Antisemitic Symbols

https://jewishcurrents.org/training-nypd-keffiyeh-watermelon-antisemitism-israel-palestine

On January 8th, senior New York Police Department (NYPD) staff joined over 150 law enforcement officers, city officials, and religious leaders at the Museum of Jewish Heritage in Lower Manhattan for a training on combating antisemitism. In a press release about the event, the Combat Antisemitism Movement (CAM)—which led the training alongside George Washington University’s Program on Extremism (POE)—said the presentation aimed to teach the police “how to recognize and address antisemitism in its many contemporary forms” and offered “tools to counter it.” But the presentation itself, exclusively obtained by Jewish Currents, was in large part concerned with pro-Palestine activism, casting the Palestine solidarity movement as a significant threat to Jewish safety despite consistent documentation that antisemitism in the United States is most prevalent among far-right white nationalists. The training, which focused heavily on student protesters, repeatedly conflated antisemitism with anti-Zionism. It categorized campus demonstrators as extremists tied to Hamas, and branded as antisemitic Palestinian symbols like the watermelon and the keffiyeh, as well as phrases such as “settler colonialism” and “all eyes on Rafah.”

Experts on antisemitism and civil liberties say the training reinforces a police culture that treats Palestinians (and Arabs and Muslims more broadly) with suspicion, while doing little to curb antisemitism. “They are actively conflating any care for Palestinian humanity or rights—and in some cases, Palestinian existence itself—with antisemitism,” said Dove Kent, the US senior director for Diaspora Alliance, a group that fights antisemitism and its weaponization. “None of this does anything to increase Jewish safety.” Instead, the trainings serve to worsen a situation where “law enforcement is on the front lines of violent anti-Palestinian repression—beating student protesters, surveilling them, and raiding them both on and off campus,” said Dylan Saba, a staff attorney at Palestine Legal (and a contributing editor for Jewish Currents). “With this training, police are being fed a description of pro-Palestinian students that, merely on the basis of their political expression, categorizes them as a security threat.” (The NYPD, the New York City mayor’s office, CAM, and POE did not return requests for comment.)

The two groups that led the NYPD training occupy different roles in the pro-Israel landscape. CAM was founded in 2019 by Adam Beren, a Trump-supporting oil tycoon. One of the organization’s main goals is lobbying elected officials around the country to adopt the controversial International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism—which classifies some anti-Zionist speech as antisemitic—into state law. CAM’s advisers include individuals with close ties to government officials around the country, such as Joel Eisdorfer, a former senior adviser to New York City Mayor Eric Adams who helped coordinate the seminar for the NYPD, and Gabe Groisman, a top ally of Florida Governor Ron DeSantis. Meanwhile, POE, created in 2015 and housed at George Washington University, describes itself as a “research center on all forms of extremism,” with a particular focus on “global jihadism, Islamism, domestic extremism and antisemitism.” The organization is led by Lorenzo Vidino, who “promotes conspiracy theories about the Muslim Brotherhood in Europe and the United States,” according to Georgetown University’s Bridge Initiative, which researches Islamophobia. POE also employs numerous former national security officials—including a former Federal Bureau of Investigation agent who helped investigate the Holy Land Foundation, a Muslim group prosecuted by the Bush administration for giving humanitarian aid to allegedly pro-Hamas Palestinian charities. (Legal experts have harshly criticized the prosecution and conviction of the Holy Land Foundation due to the government’s reliance on the testimony of anonymous Israeli intelligence agents, and the fact that the Palestinian charities funded by the foundation were also funded by the US government.)

Now, CAM and POE have capitalized on law enforcement’s interest in anti-Zionist activity, which has peaked in the aftermath of October 7th, 2023 amid an upsurge of campus protests against Israel’s bombardment of Gaza. Prior to the NYPD seminar this January, CAM and POE had teamed up in late 2024 to give trainings to law enforcement agencies in Virginia in sessions co-organized by Governor Glenn Youngkin. The presentations attempted to outline Hamas’s alleged “ongoing efforts to infiltrate the American education system,” and tried to link prominent Muslim American groups like American Muslims for Palestine and the Council on American-Islamic Relations to Hamas. Subsequently, Virginia lawmakers wrote a resolution commending the CAM and POE training for “resulting in real-world results,” with “investigators identifying and thwarting potential threats to public safety thanks to improved recognition of evidence associated with extremism during probes of unrelated criminal activities.” And Virginia is not alone in having CAM and POE present to its police. This January, then-Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody (who is now a Florida senator) announced that Florida’s federal, state, and local law enforcement officers would attend an April 30th seminar given by CAM and POE on “the presence of Hamas in America and campus protests,” building on post-October 7th efforts by government officials and Israel advocacy groups to allege without evidence that student protesters are violating “material support” laws against assisting Hamas.
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Training for NYPD Officers Categorized the Keffiyeh and Watermelon as Antisemitic Symbols (Original Post) WhiskeyGrinder Apr 25 OP
To say that Beastly Boy Apr 25 #1
Hundreds of Scholars, NGOs, the UN Special Rapporteur on Racism, among others have warned about the IHRA definition. AloeVera Apr 25 #2
This workng definition was adopted by 47 states and hundreds of NGOs, Beastly Boy Apr 26 #3
Of course it was "adopted". The large majority are MEMBERS of the IHRA so they are not going to oppose it. AloeVera Apr 26 #4
Wow... I didn't know this! Beastly Boy Apr 26 #5

Beastly Boy

(12,094 posts)
1. To say that
Fri Apr 25, 2025, 09:32 AM
Apr 25

the keffiyeh or images of watermelon are symbols that DON'T “incite hatred, violence, or discrimination against Jewish individuals or communities.” is just as inaccurate as saying they do.

It's all in the context. To me, seeing a bunch of loud entitled keffiyeh-wearing Upper West Side hipsters holding up images of watermelons is just bizarre and, frankly, laughable. To a NYC cop, it is a red flag, not necessarily an antisemitic symbol outside of the protests, but calling for increased awareness of possible trouble to come. And there had been plenty of instances in which keffiyeh wearing demonstrators escalated otherwise permissible exercises of free speech into demonstrable by-the-book antisemitic incidents.

And there is nothing controversial about the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance definition of antisemitism. It is widely accepted as a go-to authoritative reference by just about everyone. With the possible exception of some far-right and far-left fringes, the editors of Jewish Currents apparently being among them.

AloeVera

(2,570 posts)
2. Hundreds of Scholars, NGOs, the UN Special Rapporteur on Racism, among others have warned about the IHRA definition.
Fri Apr 25, 2025, 11:58 AM
Apr 25

Even the lead author of the IHRA has warned that it was a WORKING definition, not meant to be used for legal purposes or codified into law - and that he feared it would be misused to suppress political speech and academic freedom. He used the term McCarthy-like.

We have seen the results of applying this expanded definition. As the scholars and other assert, truthful political speech and accurate descriptions of Israel's actions are not anti-semitism.

Expanding the definition to include criticism of Israel not only unjustly harms Palestinians and human rights advocates, but is transparently racist. It is based on the belief that all Palestinians (and supporters) are inherently anti-semitic - merely for defending their rights and their lives - as if they don't have the same rights as everyone else.

It has apparently not occurred to Israel and the IHRA's defenders that it might - just might - be possible to feel compassion and outrage on behalf of Palestinians and be motivated to speak out based on something other than Jew hatred. And that lack of understanding betrays the racist undercurrent at the heart of this issue. And that is what is allowing and tolerating the ongoing slaughter in Gaza and the hunting down of pro-Palestinians on campuses.

Beastly Boy

(12,094 posts)
3. This workng definition was adopted by 47 states and hundreds of NGOs,
Sat Apr 26, 2025, 12:17 PM
Apr 26

making it a legal (not to be confused with legally binding) definitionin their jurisdictions.

And even as a working definition, it loses none of its well-documented wide acceptance as a go-to authoritative reference for defining antisemitism.

Certainly, there are reactionary forces that resent it working so well for so many diverse groups. And they are not shy showing off their resentments in all sorts of specious ways.

AloeVera

(2,570 posts)
4. Of course it was "adopted". The large majority are MEMBERS of the IHRA so they are not going to oppose it.
Sat Apr 26, 2025, 12:47 PM
Apr 26

Israel's pressure tactics worked well too.

But maybe not so well. What about the other 150 or so countries?

It's "working well" all right - for the state of Israel and for Trump!

Not so well for the innocent people victimized by both the definition and the misuse of it. Not so well for civil liberties and constitutional rights either. Nor for the ivy league universities and their academic freedom. The amount of damage it is causing is enormous.

Beastly Boy

(12,094 posts)
5. Wow... I didn't know this!
Sat Apr 26, 2025, 07:24 PM
Apr 26

Albania, Bosnia, Colombia, Cyprus, Guatemala, Kosovo, Moldova, Panama, Philippines, Scotland, South korea, Uruguay... all members of IHRA?

Those victimizers of innocent people are doing way better than I expected! Does that make the IHRA definition controversial?

So which less controversial definitions of antisemitism was adopted by more countries than that? And how many countries outright rejected the IHRA definition of antisemitism, or are considering this definition controversial? And, using your own standards, what would be the definition of antisemitism you would find less controversial?

Anything wrong with member states adopting the IHRA definition?

Maybe the fault is not with IHRA but entirely elsewhere, in far more controversial spheres of discourse, don't you think?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Training for NYPD Officer...