General Discussion

no_hypocrisy

(54,292 posts) Thu Apr 24, 2025, 06:37 PM Apr 2025

OK, let the games begin . . . . .

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

OK, let the games begin . . . . . (Original Post) no_hypocrisy Apr 2025 OP

Why not? pwb Apr 2025 #1

All righty then Hekate Apr 2025 #2

good lord let those people live WhiskeyGrinder Apr 2025 #3

Exactly Tribetime Apr 2025 #13

BS malaise Apr 2025 #4

Why?? AKwannabe Apr 2025 #6

It's unconstitutional malaise Apr 2025 #7

So was presidential immunity. Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2025 #8

So. Rule of law and all that? AKwannabe Apr 2025 #9

Yes. The only ones who don't know better GoCubsGo Apr 2025 #11

I tend to agree that this is meant to Annoy The Hell out of drumphf, and Magats electric_blue68 Apr 2025 #14

OMG!!!! AKwannabe Apr 2025 #5

Y'all think the xian-know-nothing magats would go for this idea? erronis Apr 2025 #10

If the Congressional Trumpzis try to pass a law to bolster some kind of argument that he can run again,... LudwigPastorius Apr 2025 #12

pwb

(12,460 posts)

1. Why not?

Reply to no_hypocrisy (Original post)

Thu Apr 24, 2025, 06:39 PM

Apr 2025

Hekate

(100,132 posts)

2. All righty then

Reply to no_hypocrisy (Original post)

Thu Apr 24, 2025, 07:13 PM

Apr 2025

WhiskeyGrinder

(26,342 posts)

3. good lord let those people live

Reply to no_hypocrisy (Original post)

Thu Apr 24, 2025, 07:18 PM

Apr 2025

Tribetime

(7,058 posts)

13. Exactly

Reply to WhiskeyGrinder (Reply #3)

Thu Apr 24, 2025, 11:11 PM

Apr 2025

malaise

(292,832 posts)

4. BS

Reply to no_hypocrisy (Original post)

Thu Apr 24, 2025, 07:23 PM

Apr 2025

That is all

AKwannabe

(6,877 posts)

6. Why??

Reply to malaise (Reply #4)

Thu Apr 24, 2025, 08:34 PM

Apr 2025

He could win again.

Fucking tRump wants to keep going… let us have our permanent replacement!

Lol

malaise

(292,832 posts)

7. It's unconstitutional

Reply to AKwannabe (Reply #6)

Thu Apr 24, 2025, 08:37 PM

Apr 2025

He knows better and so do all of you.

Hassin Bin Sober

(27,387 posts)

8. So was presidential immunity.

Reply to malaise (Reply #7)

Thu Apr 24, 2025, 08:38 PM

Apr 2025

AKwannabe

(6,877 posts)

9. So. Rule of law and all that?

Reply to malaise (Reply #7)

Thu Apr 24, 2025, 08:39 PM

Apr 2025

👌

OK

Obama could win and I’ll stand on that!

GoCubsGo

(34,669 posts)

11. Yes. The only ones who don't know better

Reply to malaise (Reply #7)

Thu Apr 24, 2025, 09:43 PM

Apr 2025

are Mr. I Deserve A ReDo, and all of his supporters, who are twisting themselves into knots to convince us all that he is eligible for a third term. (Not that I think he's even going to make it to the end of this one...) That hat in the OP is meant to fuck with them, and rub their hypocrisy in their own faces, because we all know damn well the whole lot of them would lose their shit if Obama ran again.

electric_blue68

(25,930 posts)

14. I tend to agree that this is meant to Annoy The Hell out of drumphf, and Magats

Reply to GoCubsGo (Reply #11)

Thu Apr 24, 2025, 11:20 PM

Apr 2025

Haaahahahahaaaaaa

Barack & Michelle have earned their rest.
I'm looking forward to seeing photos of his Presidential Library when it's open, and then if I can't afford to visit Chicago.

AKwannabe

(6,877 posts)

5. OMG!!!!

Reply to no_hypocrisy (Original post)

Thu Apr 24, 2025, 08:31 PM

Apr 2025

Wouldn’t that BE THE SHIT!?!??????

Wooooobaby!
Let’s GO!

erronis

(22,665 posts)

10. Y'all think the xian-know-nothing magats would go for this idea?

Reply to no_hypocrisy (Original post)

Thu Apr 24, 2025, 08:52 PM

Apr 2025

Buy some stock in gun/ammunition companies.

Seriously, though. The concept that we could, once again, run a female or a non-xian-white male for office? HELL YES!

LudwigPastorius

(14,176 posts)

12. If the Congressional Trumpzis try to pass a law to bolster some kind of argument that he can run again,...

Reply to no_hypocrisy (Original post)

Thu Apr 24, 2025, 11:09 PM

Apr 2025

I'm sure it will say that only nonconsecutive two term presidents may run for a third.

No telling what kind of shit-show Supreme Court we'll have to decide its legality by the time it comes up.

Reply to this discussion